this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
136 points (99.3% liked)

politics

25518 readers
2649 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

gerrymandering intensifies

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

It's a double edged sword during a wave election. Gerrymandering is predicated on putting a plurality of Your Team reps in seats with single digit margins and Their Team reps in seats with oversized 80/20 margins.

If Your Team drops by ten points in the polls, suddenly all your "Safe" seats aren't. Look at what happened in Alabama during the 2018 Senate Race.

The catch is that the incoming majority then has an opportunity to rewrite the districts in their own favor - break up the consolidated 80/20 seats and spread those voters around. If they don't do that (as Dems failed to do in '07/'09 or '18/'20) then normal election seasons favor Republicans and you get a '10/'14/'22 reversion to the mean.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah. So let's take our foot off the throttle like in 2024. Because that worked so well back then.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Do you mean 2020? Because the only thing getting throttled in 2024 was Dems.

There was a few week period of interia between when Biden had dropped out, and before Harris had done anything to define herself as candidate, where most people were proceeding on the assumptions we could make based on her 2020 primary run. But then she said "fuck all that" and said she was just going to do the exact same things as Biden.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, I got multiple mailers yesterday trying to convince me to vote against the CA redistricting plan. Hard to tell if they’re from the right or left, but it doesn’t really matter. These fuckers in Sacramento are doing everything they can to make sure we don’t win back the House.

[–] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're from Charles T. Munger, a billionaire who lives in Palo Alto who champions Republican causes. It's almost always a billionaire, not rejected representatives.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Ahh thank you! Very good to know.

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 week ago

It’s just retaliation voting. Dems aren’t gonna change.