this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
1 points (60.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

4087 readers
285 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No pics of text

Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/37874537

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Classic. Liberal arts trying to justify itself assuming technical people cannot communicate, think, or understand context. Good luck with that. To make good money you have to have a specialty. Preferably a masters or a technical degree and I mean that in the broadest way.

Sure you can start with liberal arts but you should expect to then get that specialty. So 6 years. For a technical education 2 to 4 years might do it but 6 might still be good. Counter balance, every year is costly both in terms of expenses, missed earnings, and time value of money. 6 years is a big barrier to entry.

Edit: I do share the concern about any hot fields. Boom and bust. Coding and now data science have been really popular so one wonders. Similarly about things that can be automated and off shored.