Technology

87980 readers

3295 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

517

Study Boldly Claims 4K And 8K TVs Aren't Much Better Than HD To Your Eyes, But Is It True? (hothardware.com)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by artifex@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

307 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A new study published in Nature by University of Cambridge researchers just dropped a pixelated bomb on the entire Ultra-HD market, but as anyone with myopia can tell you, if you take your glasses off, even SD still looks pretty good :)

(page 4) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's why I have a 65" and sit barely 2m from it. Stick on a 4k Dolby Vision encoded file through Jellyfin. Looks fucking great!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

They did get around to saying it's pixel density at the end...

But still, it's human variation. Everybody is gonna be different. I'm not a resolution snob, but anything under 100fps pulls me out of the experience. So usually I just run at 1440, when I have fps to spare I'll put all the settings up rather than go to 4k.

Other people would rather 30fps at 4 or even 8k

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

But they are much better for energy companies

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Me getting 480p videos for my video projector : "Oh... no really?" ¯\(ツ)/¯

PS: FWIW I do have a Vision Pro (for work, I didn't pay for it personally) so I technically could enjoy high res content... but honestly I can't bother using this to watch videos. I'm fine with just my desktop screen or video projector. I just don't get the high res.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is pretty obvious due to how they had to add HDR at the same time to sell it. The HDR was a real progression, but they wouldn’t get to sell you higher res Blu-ray formats and streaming packages with just that.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 points 10 months ago

I watch 576i DVDs on a 24" 1366x768 TV and I don't mind because I sit reasonably far.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I've been saying this for years.

load more comments