this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
26 points (84.2% liked)

politics

25432 readers
1957 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unruffled@anarchist.nexus 30 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Well that was an uninspiring read.

At several sessions, a leader of the donation portal ActBlue shared a “fight song” that the party could adopt, putting its lyrics on screens so that the crowds could sing along.

D-E-M-S, we rise!
Stronger together — blue skies!
Lift your voice, we’re bold and true,
Onward, Democrats — We shine blue!

So what I'm taking away from that is they stand for aviation? and being loud, shiny and blue? Checks out.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's what we were missing... a fight song! Not sound policy or a consistent commitment to middle class values or putting corporate leaders on notice, but the most generic song that probably came out of an AI chat bot and says essentially nothing about what your values are. 👏👏👏

[–] unruffled@anarchist.nexus 8 points 1 day ago

You can't polish a turd—as the saying goes—but you can sprinkle glitter on it.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Imagine the kind of dipshit who's eating this up 🫣🤢🤮

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is value in a rallying cry. Your favorite sports teams often have one. If you watch college sports, they usually have a fight song, and people even know/enjoy them. Something gutteral to energize the base, and gather them together.

This isn't one of those.

Hilarious that you (and the dems) think that everyone is as easily manipulated into a cult mentality as sports fans are. Maybe the dems should try doing the wave at their tallys too? Or bring out cheerleaders?

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago

The party of lame uncles

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

Embarrassing. They keep making this so much harder than it needs to be.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

All I learned is that Democrats identify as smurfs.

A bunch of old dipshits are so out of touch, they have no idea how embarrassing and cringe this is.

That's what to take away from this.

[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 4 points 1 day ago

This is so pathetic

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This sounds like a bunch of out of touch middle aged dorks trying to convince the youth they're still cool.

Actblue is in my spam mailbox everyother day begging for money to support this dreck..

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's strongly reminiscent of the kind of crap you see when companies try to create a corporate culture. The result is almost inevitably simultaneously cultish and depressing.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'd much rather than spend time talking about what we're going to do for us as a country.... Forget being strong start countering the God damn Nazis man it's not that hard..

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

That gives me the blues.

[–] benny@reddthat.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because winning back the lost union vote is too hard a strategy to execute.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That vote is lost.

The Teamsters supported Trump 58 to Harris's 31 after Biden withdrew (who was 44.3 to 36.3)

You know what the real difference was between them, and it wasn't Biden's mediocre union support.

[–] benny@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Let's go back to 90s with free trade agreements, EFCA miss under Obama, PRO act not going anywhere, declining union membership, oligarchy levels of inequality... like any politician worth listening to should be able to figure this out.

If you still want to paint people who work at a company like Ford, seeing what Trump has done with tariffs and calling their vote anything other than a desired union policy outcome. I am not sure what to say.