this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84110 readers
3117 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
1
Generative AI is reportedly tripling carbon dioxide emissions from data centers (www.techradar.com)
submitted 2 years ago by JRepin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20289663

A report from Morgan Stanley suggests the datacenter industry is on track to emit 2.5 billion tons by 2030, which is three times higher than the predictions if generative AI had not come into play.

The extra demand from GenAI will reportedly lead to a rise in emissions from 200 million tons this year to 600 million tons by 2030, thanks largely to the construction of more data centers to keep up with the demand for cloud services.

all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Does that take into account that AI models will become more efficient with time?

[–] wondrous_strange@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Why would it? Not relevant at the slightest. By then obscene amounts of emissions will be already emitted and money made, and the damage is already here. How will some improvment in a model gonna offset that? (Its not)

Another point to consider is that on the same timeline, demand for that product also grows at scary rates

And of course the never ending greed of capitalists

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"The only way to interpret statistics is with a healthy dose of skepticism and a thorough understanding of their context."

While people in this thread jump at the opportunity for this slice of statistics to affirm their confirmation biases, intelligent people will ask what the total carbon dioxide output looks like by comparison.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can't be logical here. This is a topic that's like discussing immigration with Republicans.