this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
155 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

74073 readers
3184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 14 points 10 hours ago

It might seem like a foregone conclusion to some, but really it isn't. I guess these companies have the same type of TOS that nobody reads, the schools just sign them, and there's no regulations holding either party back.

Schools pay for the services directly or may request federal grant funding to cover the costs.

Originally intended to support students’ mental health and prevent adverse school events, such as school shootings, the study found that school-based online surveillance companies are extensively monitoring students’ digital behavior, both during and outside of school hours, often using artificial intelligence (AI) with little human oversight or transparency.

The research team identified 14 companies actively marketing online surveillance services frequently beyond school-issued devices and outside of school premises, raising concerns about privacy, equity and oversight

86% of companies monitor students 24 hours per day and 7 days per week, not just during school hours.

It's like using a fishy mental health app that sells All Your Data to the highest bidder. Except with minors who didn't even make the decision to install that app themselves.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

"But think of the children!" 😂

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Wow, where do I start with how insane this is?

Those aren't 'services', those are personal privacy intrusions. For PROFIT. There is no way this could happen without the school's cooperation. AFTER they got the parent's permission, that's not good enough. They ought not only to have that permission (not to mention spelling it out for each student), but also know exactly what data is gathered, every place it is sent to, what privacy protections are in place, and what is done with it once it's "evaluated", In detail, per student, 24/7.

"student communications monitoring" 24-7 and/or outside of school is SPYING. There is NO legal OR educational OR ethical mandate for this collecting.

If the kids don't know about unknown adults prying into their personal lives, AND KEEPING RECORDS ABOUT IT, that's not necessarily their fault. If the parents don't know about it, that's the school's fault for not getting their knowing permission. AND guarantee their physical and mental safety. (Which is impossible, because as we hear about all the time, hospitals, banks, companies, etc. are constantly leaking personal information or getting hit by ransomware attacks.

If I was the parent of one of those students and wasn't told about it, I'd sue that school into a coma.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 21 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)
  1. Kids post publicly on social media under their own name.

  2. School find out what they said publicly.

  3. SurprisedPikachuFace.jpg

Not blaming the victims, but like... parents really need to be teaching kids what social media is.

I'm glad I was a socially awkward kid that was too shy to post things publicly. (I mean like.... I didn't even have an account because I didn't want people to see "0 friends" on the profile lol)

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Some of us do teach our kids and they just don't care, I guess. My oldest (17) has had a smartphone for a few years. She knows what not to do on social media. Does it anyway. That pretty well tracks with the rest of her (mostly) poor decisions. What can I say? She's ...Consistent. 🤷‍♂️

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 9 hours ago

No way. Someone is looking into an open window. Wow.