Fades

joined 2 years ago
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

not pictured are all the ignorant morons that believe billionaire news media that sanewashes the people those pictured in hoods follow.

reality has nuance, removing it hurts us all.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

the "right" that you refer to doesn't exist, because the overton window has been slammed really fucking far right. There is a sea of idiots somewhere in the middle, Trump was able to take advantage of that, telling them he would fix it all quickly. That lie will only become harder to ignore as these same idiots struggle more and more to afford groceries.

These are the people that are not hard right, but they are hard dumb. Reality and struggle is the best teacher and they're about to get a lesson they have never had before in their safe relatively comfortable American lives.

By just crossing them all off as 'the right' and that they want fascism is foolish and self-defeating. Yes the far right DO want this, but everyone that isn't some semblance of 'left' are absolutely not the only ones that don't.

Blanket statements provide no value, only serve to remove nuance, and the removal of nuance only serves fascists.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

OH boy I sure do love purity checks. It's worked out so great for us in the past.

Why is this shit always all or nothing, goddamn. It works for maga because they have no nuance and it's all groupthink, but the rest of the nation is far more complex and won't just go for a hard left progressive in the same way. It needs to happen but it won't happen in a single election.

I am in no way endorsing newsome, but at least he's doing LITERALLY ANYTHING.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world -3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Liberals are in bed with MAGA

What an absurd and reductive take, have you considered including a drop of nuance with your hyperbole?

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The closest I've seen is an interview With Tim Miller of The Bulwark and Jeffries. In that interview he presses him on that, where's the endorsement? All he could bring himself to answer with was 'I can tell you, the only person I have scheduled meetings with are with Mamdani', so actually I'd say it's pretty clear that DNC leadership isn't backing Cuomo but also not doing much for Mamdani either, which is bad and absurd but not as bad actually as backing someone other than who the people chose in the primary.

You can't simply take the lack of vocal support in this intermediate time in between as clear evidence that they back Cuomo, reality is far more nuanced. Your take could have more ground to stand on as we get closer to the actual election without anything different happening though.

interview link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_szbshrgQHg