WishBoneThugaNHarmony

joined 3 weeks ago

Just wanted to say, I agree 100%. And to support your first point, I had not heard of Barack Obama until right before he ran, and I voted for him twice. There is hope (see what I did there?).

I agree that merit should be first and foremost. It's just difficult to verify merit on an entity when that entity is an unknown. The concept is met with inherent skepticism. That said, I had not heard of Barack Obama until briefly before he ran, and I voted for him twice.

I think the issue is, people today vote emotionally, not necessary logically. That's why at this current moment I would be more likely to vote for Jon Stewart. But if I were to learn more about Naomi Murakawa (and I will educate myself on them shortly, I promise) and I liked what I saw, then I would be more likely to vote for them than I am in this moment.

[–] WishBoneThugaNHarmony@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Because when you say, "Naomi Murakawa", I say "who?" I'm very plugged into US politics and I have literally never heard that name before. They do not have the name recognition to win. Not trying to be a jerk here, in case my tone is misinterpreted.