this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
403 points (95.3% liked)

politics

25872 readers
3177 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A lot of people here are condemning celebrity in US politics, and I get it... but at this point in time we might need someone who is already famous yet consistent and trustworthy. Stewart has shown himself to be a good person for decades. He's also politically informed, progressive, and whip smart.

We need a candidate who wants real change for the betterment of the working class. Somehow people thought that was Trump... I guess because he said he would be, a few times? And people were hoping hard? And not looking at his track record at all? Also racism? More importantly though: people didn't think that candidate was Harris, who got pushed through by the Democratic party and ran an uninspiring campaign. Those people didn't vote. Those people were excited about candidates like Bernie, who's track record on class issues is indefatigable. Those people could potentially be excited about Jon Stewart tearing shit down for the actually betterment of the poor, and might trust that he would try.

That's my read, anyway. A Mamdani could come along and stir up some real enthusiasm, but I think it's harder for a no-name without a proven record to win a national election. Last time that happened we ended up with Obama, and people still feel burned by his lack of progressive action.

[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 49 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Zelenskyy did it. Ukraine would no longer exist as a sovereign nation today if he didn't; it would have been entirely annexed into Russia right now.

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly. In the US right now, only a comedian is capable of getting the joke. It works everywhere else it's been tried. Vote Stewart!

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Can you stupid fucks stop worshiping celebrities for like FIVE MINUTES.

I don't get how mindless our population is.

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Volodymyr Zelenskyy was a standup comedian and I think he's doing a pretty good job as president.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Jon could absolutely destroy anyone on a debate stage. Mainly because it's a popularity contest, and he's spent his entire life learning to be popular on screen and stage. He's also a smart guy with great insight into a lot of situations.

None of that means he would be a good president. It's a different set of skills.

The bottom line though, would he be better than the alternative? And I hear what you're saying. Those nazi crack monkey's put on a hell of a show, how could Jon possibly do a better job? I'm not sure, but given the option, I think I'd give him a shot.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think the Jon for president thing is copium, but to be fair Jon does have two of the most important traits in a president: conviction and a good bullshit detector. Whether he'd be able to do the day to day work aside, there's no reason to believe he wouldn't be able to lead the country in a better direction in a big picture sense.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

I think Jon would have the intelligence and humility to have very qualified, intelligent people to advise and challenge him.

My only concern for him is he would take it very seriously, and not be able to let anything go. He would burn himself out hard in 4 years.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

most important traits in a president: conviction

And not in the way that Trump has convictions.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He would mop the floor at the debates but I’m not sure debates matter anymore. I remember “they’re eating the cats” not mattering as much as it should have.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'd normally say "hells no, stop electing celebrities!" but this is a person who is actually politically informed (savvy even) and at this point possibly bthenonoy person why might get the US out of this miserable shit it's in and on to a path towards an actual representative democracy.

If anything, Jon Stewart might be the only person able to get the US to stop electing celebrities in the first place

So yeah, Jon 2028!

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want to say no celebrities or billionaires so badly, but if you believe that nearly ALL politicians are irredeemably corrupt, then that's where we have to go for the people with the money and/or name recognition to win.

If you are going to vote for someone other than a politician, than an intelligent person who has spent the last couple of decades closely following politics and commenting on it every night might be a good option, provided they have the morals for it. I generally don't think much of the morals of billionaires or celebrities, but they're far better than MAGAs. At least they aren't enthusiastic traitors and pedophiles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (25 children)

Or, hear me out: we abolish the presidency. There’s absolutely no need for so much power to be vested in one person.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

I mean for a country that fought the monarchy you have sure been making the president the king. Your ceremonies for them have always reminded me of monarchy.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Lets divide the presidency into 3 roles. We can call it a triumvirate.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just have him be White House Spokesperson. Perfect role for him.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Exactly this.

The Dems are so bereft of charismatic folks in their ranks because their own internal power-squabbling and pressure between dusty old skeletons to keep themselves in office, that anyone who HAS the skill set has had to spend that time in the entertainment industry at best. They're so dogmatic about internal "it's your time" protocols that they would rather sink AOC and Bernie forever so that the political equivalent of Assistant Regional Managers can get promoted to Regional Manager.

Both parties are broken to shit, and this is why Dems aren't doing a single thing to fight anything, they expect to just sit back and have it handed to them later. It'll be too late by then. We need an entire wave of new blood. Fuck this 2-party system.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 month ago (10 children)

It's so cute that Americans think there will be a 2028 election.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Stuart Colbert 28'! My fingers would break I'd vote so hard for that.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

I'm just saying, his name is spelled correctly right there in the original post... lol

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why the fuck are people so obsessed with celebrities? Elect someone actually competent for the job. Idiots.

[–] drcabbage@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The competent people never get elected.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Unless they're competent AND popular. Zelensky was a comedian before getting elected as well. Now he's basically done the impossible and held his own against Russia despite overwhelming forces. Regardless of your political beliefs, a comedian has done better fighting off Putin than literally anyone else ever. That's an undeniable fact.

So Stewart should run. Because he's the closest thing to competent who's popular enough to win we'll likely ever get again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SheepHerder@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

The election is a popularity contest, so skill has almost nothing to do with it.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Yes, yes, yes. He’s not just a TV show host. He legitimately puts his time, money, and reputation where his mouth is. I have a lot of respect for Jon Stewart as a person with moral character, intelligence, and influence. I would advocate forcing him into the election even if he doesn’t want it. In fact, that he doesn’t want it is all the more reason to push. We need someone like him desperately.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Anybody that doesn’t want the job is imminently more qualified that anybody who does in my opinion.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago

Well, the Ukrainians elected a comedian and got a true leader.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Americans elect a non celebrity challenge (impossible)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So finaly, you will get Stewart instead of King

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

I mean, ideally we shouldn't be just running celebrities but after 8 months of this shit I don't give a fuck anymore. Mentally I am here:

If it works I literally could not care less. Clearly the people want vibes so let's just give them the fucking vibes and deal with THAT issue when things aren't actively on fire.

Whatever else Stewart is, he's knowledgeable, charismatic, willing to fight for a cause, and DOES genuinely seem to give a fuck about the average person. That's a damn good start at least.

And all of THAT is even under the assumption we get something at least vaguely resembling a normal election, which at this point I think is entirely dependent on when exactly Diddler on the Roof finally strokes out on the shitter.

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The Venn diagram overlap of personality characteristics of modern politicians and celebrities is extraordinarily large. Pure charisma drives success in modern media-driven politics. It's sad, but I believe it's truth now.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Fucking yes. YES.

I wish he ran against Joe.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just an interesting observation I've had about the comments here: everyone against this is misspelling his name

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes please. I've been wanting him to run for decades and I was hoping when he left the daily show he might end up on the path. I know he doesn't want to do it, but no one who SHOULD have the job really WANTS the job, because they know what it means to do that job properly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (30 children)

Oh Jesus more celebrities in politics is the last thing you guys need

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Zelensky was also a comedian. It's woklrking out surprisingly okay for him given the situation.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

I mean he worked hard for veterans rights.

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

John Stewart is probably the only one I could actually get behind.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Americans dont really know how to judge a persons character... Look at the choices for the last few decades... They have all been horrible people, except maybe Joe Biden who was unable to function instead.

Yes, Jon seems like a good person but I dont think good people are attracted to career politics. Its for the snakes and the lizards.

But yeah, he would be a good fit if he wanted to sacrifice his happiness for that role. I think he is way too smart for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›