domi

joined 2 years ago
[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Besides what was mentioned below, it's not about making competitive products but about Nvidia being an absolute asshole since the 2000s and they got even worse ever since the crypto and AI craze started. AMD and Nvidia are both corporations but they are not even playing the same game when it comes to being anti-competitive.

There's a reason why Wikipedia has a controversies section on Nvidia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia#Controversies

That list is far from exhaustive. There's so much more about Nvidia that you should remember vividly if you were a PC gamer in the 2000s and 2010s with an AMD GPU, like:

  • When they pushed developers to use an unecessary amount of tesselation because they knew tesselation performed worse on AMD
  • When they pushed their Gameworks framework which heavily gimped AMD GPUs
  • When they pushed their PhysX framework which automatically offloaded to CPU on AMD GPUs
  • When they disabled their GPUs in their driver when they detected an AMD GPU is also present in the system
  • When they were cheating in benchmarks by adding optimizations specific to those benchmarks
  • When they shipped an incomplete Vulkan implementation but claimed they are compliant

Nvidia has been gimping gaming performance and visuals since forever for both AMD GPUs and even their own customers and we haven't even gotten to DLSS and raytracing yet.

I refuse to buy anything Nvidia until they stop abusing their market position at every chance they get.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 1 points 3 weeks ago

Mostly, I'm not big enough to trigger anything there.

Also, since ISPs usually only get a single humongous IPv6 block, it's actually pretty hard to know what is okay to block. Somebody might be on a /48, /56 or /64 network but they might also just have a single IPv6 address. Since you're blocking quintillions of IP addresses with each /64 net, the risk of hitting innocent IPs is high.

Also also, I'm not sure if Google is actually prepared for such a case. Since all the requests coming from Invidious just seem like legit unauthenticated requests, it's hard to flag them on IPv6 when the IPs are fully randomized.

Still, Google is moving towards requiring a login for everything. So I assume that method won't work for much longer.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My favorite thing to use IPv6 for is to use the privacy extension to get around IP blocks on YouTube when using alternative front ends. Blocked by Google on my laptop? No problem, let me just get another one of my 4,722,366,482,869,645,213,696 IP addresses.

I have a separate subnet which is IPv6 only and rotates through IP addresses every hour or so just for Indivious, Freetube and PipePipe.