fonix232

joined 2 years ago
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Guess Conservapedia wasn't conservative enough.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

Gotta push a borderline centrist who's popular just so that actual left thinkers don't get publicity.

Holy shit I can't wait for legacy media to die in a fiery death.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago

But have you ever thought about what Hunter Biden made

He made a bunch of dick pics of his massive schlong, and certain Republicans were so enamored by it, they had to show it off to all their colleagues.

This is such two tier HR. If I went around showing nice dick pics of big schlongs, I'd be fired. And the ones who actually did it are still in office.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago

I had to double check to make sure I wasn't reading The Onion. These word salads are literally on the level of a parody of the orange turdsack.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

About 15 years ago, yes. There were a few videos of him talking borderline eloquently about political issues, but then again back then he was supporting the Democrats.

I'm more and more suspecting that like Fetterman, he had a stroke too that put him down this path.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

Stable Fucking Genius.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A criminal investigation is a bit more complex topic than homework. You can't pick and choose the things, you need to conduct a thorough investigation uncovering every potentially relevant fact and building a case based on that. Miss evidence, miss a connection, and your case is thrown out during cross-examination. How do you think it sounds to a judge that oops, you didn't do this and that and that, investigating connected crimes etc., because you "wanted a quick conviction"?

Trump's crimes were incredibly inter-connected, and the court case wasn't to convince voters but to convince a judge.

Voters are convinced by even simple rumours, you don't even need an actual criminal investigation, just lie and spread the rumour that one is happening, and bam, you got a bunch of people now dead-set against whomever these made up investigations are happening of. That's how MAGA operates, that's how the whole Hunter Biden thing went on and frenzied half your country. Wild rumours until a fraction of what they were shouting materialised, and literally all they've got to show for it is his dick pics on the Senate and House floor... But the average MAGA was convinced and that was enough.

Do you think the reverse would be enough? Just dirty Trump until MAGA turns away? Frivolous lawsuits based on partial investigations? That would just further convince MAGA that it's a baseless, political witch-hunt.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Good.

The US really needs a fresh start, from scratch.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're presuming there would be a reasonable judge and not one already bought and paid for.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The issue was the amount of illegal shit they did, that resulted in the various proceedings. The discovery for all the crimes went on too long, and as you've seen from the lawsuits that were thrown out... it's not wise to start one without rock solid evidence and a fully built case.

On the other hand the moment SCOTUS ruled that any official act of POTUS is fully legal, regardless of technical legality, he should've had Trump shot. Period.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Tried working out in loose underwear once. My balls were sagging 10 minutes in, and at one point managed to slam them right into my thigh during a spin.

It was worse than being kicked in the nuts.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

A man, or an ass?

For the latter I recommend the zoo.

view more: ‹ prev next ›