wholookshere

joined 6 months ago
[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

forgive my snarkiness. its usually the quickest way to this realization.

[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

what has been published by deep seek is the music, not the software, the music.

[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

can you show me the actual source code?

the human readable code, not the weights.

[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 15 hours ago (9 children)

no,

your changing the definition of open source software. which has been around a lot longer than AI has.

source code is what defines open source.

what deepseek has is open weights. they publish the results of their learning only. not the source that produced it.

[–] wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I really wish there was one better than Gramerly and now this....