this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
906 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

81621 readers
5212 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 49 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

The sales of the glasses have been better than their VR headset which has really made them double down on the glasses as they see big potential. That said, I really think that it is a false hope as I suspect the market that is ok wearing Facebook glasses are small, but loyal.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 29 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

These things should not be protected property. If you assault my privacy, I should be allowed to attack back.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Most countries it's legal to record in public, as there's no reasonable expectation of privacy. Though these are a bit different than say someone with a phone or camera, as unless you pay close attention the glasses are easy to miss....

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 minutes ago

These glasses cams are small enough to no longer be visible as a camera.

I'm all for freedom to record outside but this is a step too far as this is not me making a video for me, this is Facebook using idiots to record the world 24/7 for them.

I'm fine with humans recording humans, immnot fine with companies recording me

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 minutes ago

Not my country and i doubt most of the EU.
There's a difference between walking by a film crew and some rando filming you whithout you even knowing.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I'm not the original commenter, but in Germany, you can record in public, but can not record individuals specifically. People walking past in the background while you record something else is fine. Recording someone specifically is not.

That's the baseline, at least. Exceptions may apply (public figures, public interest, etc).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_rights#Germany

A succinct statement of the German law can be found in the following judicial statement from the Marlene Dietrich case: the general right of personality has been recognised in the case law of the German Federal Court of Justice since 1954 as a basic right constitutionally guaranteed by Articles 1 and 2 of the Basic Law and at the same time as an "other right" protected in civil law under § 823 (1) of the BGB (established case law since BGHZ 13, 334, 338—readers' letters). It guarantees as against all the world the protection of human dignity and the right to free development of the personality. Special forms of manifestation of the general right of personality are the right to one's own picture (§§ 22 ff. of the KUG [de]) and the right to one's name (§ 12 of the BGB). They guarantee protection of the personality for the sphere regulated by them.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree. Secretly recording someone with a phone is much easier than doing it with one of these. It's the same issue people had with Google Glass back in the day.

I think the reason it feels creepier is because, if you're talking with someone that's wearing them, it feels like they're sticking a camera in your face.

But like I could turn on my phone camera, leave it sticking out of my pocket, and record everyone taking a piss in a public restroom with nobody noticing. If I tried to do that with glasses, I'd have to turn my head towards everyone's cock, one at a time. The neck pain alone makes it not worth the effort.

But to be clear, fuck Meta. These glasses should be banned for many other reasons.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Agree with you for the most part.

Though your example of a public toilet is a bit flawed, since there IS a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Google Glass was waaaaaaaaaay more obvious.

Where the meta ones are a little less so.

Depending on lighting, and distance from the Glasshole, could be really hard to spot the Meta ones.

[–] teft@piefed.social 5 points 4 hours ago

Agreed. My friend has a pair of the meta glasses and i didn’t even realize they were meta glasses until he told me. The camera isn’t very noticeable unless you know what you’re looking for.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago

I've seen some amazing POV footage from them, because the lens is actually in line with your eye level.

So, a lot of the market would be people who would otherwise use a GoPro.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

yahknow, if it wern't for the fact that i know they're a scummy company, i'd try them.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Why? Are they useful for anything other than proping up surveillance state?

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 minutes ago
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

just wait patiently for valve to make some

[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip -5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (5 children)

... Spoiler for you, but Valve is a shitty company.

Edit: whoosh the fanbois are out there! We don't share the same value if you think it's ok for 10 years old to become gambling addicts because of Valve's practices.

I deleted my Reddit account because it is increasingly becoming an echo chamber cesspool of extreme centrism. I was hoping Lemmy would be somehow better with people more prone to discuss. Ho, well

[–] chasteinsect@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Maybe just maybe it's because it's not as black or white as you make it seem? Especially talking about a company that did so much for Linux and looking at what their competition is doing....

[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 1 points 25 minutes ago (1 children)

So it's ok for you to have 10 years old developing a gambling habit and potentially ruining their live, because hey they are pushing Linux in gaming?

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 minutes ago

Did valve create the gambling games you mention?

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

I get why people like Valve so much (I like some of their services too) but there's too much deification. It's like "oh mighty Gabe!". I get some of it was tongue-in-cheek a bit initially but it seems so many people take it seriously.

They're a company that provides some services I like but the gambling shit is bad especially when you see people on YT talking about how they were lured in when they young and how much money was lost and how many streamers were running scam companies. It's not good.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 4 points 5 hours ago

I agree with you, but I get where the rabid fanboyism is coming from. The lack of competition in tech due to a variety of bullshit reasons (mostly corruption, look what Biden's FTC was trying to do compared to Trump 2's mask-off approach) have people pissed off and angry at the monopolists. Valve just so happens to be the least-bad monopolist in tech, so people like them.

People need to get competition-pilled, so they realize that Valve isn't our savior, and are in fact part of the problem too. They might be considered "good" today, but that's because our standards have never been so low.

Things can be, and should be better.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

name your top 5 good companies

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago

I imagine you're focused on for-profit companies

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -4 points 13 hours ago

Ngl, I can see an use for AI assistant glasses.

If it weren't for the payload.