this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
203 points (98.6% liked)

Fuck AI

5751 readers
902 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
203
AIs can generate near-verbatim copies of novels from training data (arstechnica.com)
submitted 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

AI and legal experts told the FT this “memorization” ability could have serious ramifications on AI groups’ battle against dozens of copyright lawsuits around the world, as it undermines their core defense that LLMs “learn” from copyrighted works but do not store copies.

Sam Altman would like to remind you each Old Lady at a Library consume 284 cubic feet of Oxygen a day from the air.

Also, hey at least they made sure to probably destroy the physical copy they ripped into their hopelessly fragmented CorpoNapster fever dream, the law is the law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 11 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I didn't cheat on you, I just didn't realize I was making love to an entirely different woman! They are different OK!!!!

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

That's a interesting question. Think of the Star Trek holodeck. If someone creates a perfect holodeck recreation of their own partner, and sleeps with that simulation, is that cheating on their partner? Let's assume it's not one of those fancy sentient holograms like the doctor, just a regular mindless one.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

what if they are the doctor and have sex with a ghost?

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 4 points 9 hours ago

That's just a good old Blazin' time

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

Eh I would say it's masturbating to a "picture" of their partner. It's just a sexy light show. As long as it's not sentient it can never have feelings back so it's just a sex toy. Ever hear of a clone-a-willy?