this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
116 points (96.8% liked)

Fuck AI

5751 readers
1948 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Been trying to get away from DuckDuckGo because of their support of "AI" stuff, but come on, one of these isn't even in English, and that's what I have my language set to.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 31 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] cloudskater@pawb.social 5 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

I know. I'm trying not to use DuckDuckGo because of their AI support. I was told this was a good search engine to use instead, but it often spits random stuff back at me.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The noai.duckduckgo.com URL is important to notice in the screenshot.

[–] wobblyunionist@piefed.social 13 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

im guessing op is aware that you can turn ai off, but generally opposed to using duckduckgo since they are generally a pro ai company

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Possibly, though as another commenter mentioned, using the noai URL for the moment is a good way to voice discontent. Not using it just falls into the "everyone uses google" narrative in a different way.

[–] seathru@quokk.au 4 points 54 minutes ago (2 children)

https://voteyesornoai.com/

If DDG's own poll didn't spell that out for them, I don't think they care.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 19 minutes ago

Yeah, fair point. I wish DDG were going in a different direction.

[–] bright_side_@piefed.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

Well that's interesting as a poll result. 👍

The article behind the link at the bottom of the site shows that this is a marketing stunt

the poll numbers are still 😇

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You really do either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain.

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

SearXNG is a mixed bag to be honest...I find that Ononoki's SearXNG delivers decent results...It's a bit mixed at times with PieFed being the third option. Some topics are surfaced better than others, so your mileage will vary with SearXNG.

Using the No AI version of DuckDuckGo sends them a message that their bet on "AI" isn't going to win them any accolades. It's an easy way to push back. As they are tracking those metrics and people can see the numbers of how many users disapprove of AI.

[–] potatoguy@mbin.potato-guy.space 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Bing and yahoo are VERY bad, it seems they detect that they are being used through proxies, I made another comment for what i use in searxng.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

DDG's backend is really just Bing, though ...

[–] potatoguy@mbin.potato-guy.space 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

They give different results, it seems they have different treatment to the data, which is interesting. Startpage gives different results than google, duckduckgo gives different results than bing, but on the bigger picture, a bigger sample gives the statistically optimal result??? (closer to the source truth on the most probable good result) question mark, huge number theory on statistics.

(i'm drunk)

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Bing in a sandboxed session yielded results identical to DDG in my experiments.

[–] potatoguy@mbin.potato-guy.space 2 points 2 hours ago

In searxng they don't give the same results, bing brings some completely different stuff both on an selfhosted instance and on an public instance (it just gives random garbage), it seems proxying does some stuff to bings internal algorithm, as google is different than startpage on searxng.

Edit: a screenshot showing it.

Given the same methodology (search algorithm) a larger sample size gives a truer picture of what that methodology favors. If the methodology isn't neutral or doesn't bias in the same way as your desired outcome then a smaller sample size analyzed by a different methodology may provide better results.

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 1 points 3 hours ago

Ah shit, I forgot to turn both those off. Ugh, I've been playing browser shuffle...Good catch!

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It's just Bing wearing a duck hat anyway

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

What search engine?

[–] starblursd@lemmy.zip -2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I use brave search, in the settings you can turn off ai answer and anonymous telemetry

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So you know:

CEO is a anti-vaxxer anti-masker asshole, and incredibly pro-AI and pro-crypto.

Also the browser did at one point "accidentally" have a crypto farm built into it.

[–] starblursd@lemmy.zip 0 points 47 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago) (1 children)

I'm so tired of the insistence that you have to agree with everything that the CEO does or says if you use a piece of software... You can turn off the ai and crypto in browser settings with a couple clicks. Also I'm talking about the search engine not the browser. I don't use the browser purely because the Linux builds split mode doesn't work nearly as clean as Zen, plus i prefer Firefox forks

I use it cause it's a search engine that gives good results and that can disable ai answers... Until I'm able to get my server PC finished to selfhost searxng

Edit they actually slopped up the browser to the point it's beyond disabling it. Literally just garbage

[–] starblursd@lemmy.zip 1 points 27 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

I don't care what a CEO (for free software) thinks or says I care what the software does. Is the software good?... The browser no. It's complete garbage the search engine. Yeah it's pretty decent. If the CEO's garbage ideals bleed into the software like it does in the browser, yeah it's trash. The search engine like almost every other mainstream search engine has AI answers except unlike a lot of others it lets you turn that off. It doesn't skew results towards his ideals, doesn't bury results under sponsored links, Has no crypto nonsense, it's just a search engine. It's not that deep

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 14 points 3 hours ago (3 children)
[–] bright_side_@piefed.world 1 points 14 minutes ago

Nice to find an up to date article, thanks

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

it seems crazy to me that people still use brave--i've been reading nothing but terrible shit about them for years

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 2 points 3 hours ago

Same, been there too. Still, it's easy to miss articles on them, they only pop up once every so often. Same for Proton.

[–] wobblyunionist@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

very helpful ty!