this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
22 points (78.9% liked)

Technology

81878 readers
5859 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RegularJoe@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Nvidia's Vera Rubin platform is the company's next-generation architecture for AI data centers that includes an 88-core Vera CPU, Rubin GPU with 288 GB HBM4 memory, Rubin CPX GPU with 128 GB of GDDR7, NVLink 6.0 switch ASIC for scale-up rack-scale connectivity, BlueField-4 DPU with integrated SSD to store key-value cache, Spectrum-6 Photonics Ethernet, and Quantum-CX9 1.6 Tb/s Photonics InfiniBand NICs, as well as Spectrum-X Photonics Ethernet and Quantum-CX9 Photonics InfiniBand switching silicon for scale-out connectivity.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

288 GB HBM4 memory

jfc..

Looking at the spec's... fucking hell these things probably cost over 100k.

I wonder if we'll see a generational performance leap with LLM's scaling to this much memory.

[–] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Current models are speculated at 700 billion parameters plus. At 32 bit precision (half float), that’s 2.8TB of RAM per model, or about 10 of these units. There are ways to lower it, but if you’re trying to run full precision (say for training) you’d use over 2x this, something like maybe 4x depending on how you store gradients and updates, and then running full precision I’d reckon at 32bit probably. Possible I suppose they train at 32bit but I’d be kind of surprised.

Edit: Also, they don’t release it anymore but some folks think newer models are like 1.5 trillion parameters. So figure around 2-3x that number above for newer models. The only real strategy for these guys is bigger. I think it’s dumb, and the returns are diminishing rapidly, but you got to sell the investors. If reciting nearly whole works verbatim is easy now, it’s going to be exact if they keep going. They’ll approach parameter spaces that can just straight up save things into their parameter spaces.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 58 minutes ago

Yeah they’re going to cost as much as a house.

I think we’ll see much larger active portions of larger MOEs, and larger context windows, which would be useful.

The non LLM models I run would benefit a lot from this, but I don’t know of I’ll ever be able to justify the cost of how much they’ll be.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

LLMs can already use way more I believe, they don't really run them on a single one of these things.

The HBM4 would likely be great for speed though.