People Twitter

8151 readers

2170 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

546

Calling BS. Pics Or It Didn't Happen (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 1 day ago by miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

185 comments fedilink hide all child comments

xcancel

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 53 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Already proven a hoax

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 4 hours ago

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

What's the Source: ?

I wanna share it with others who still believe it's true

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 39 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

On September 11, 2025, The Wall Street Journal issued a caution regarding its earlier report on an internal law-enforcement bulletin concerning the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk. The bulletin had mentioned ammunition found near the scene with “transgender and anti-fascist ideology” engravings, but the Justice Department indicated the report might not accurately reflect the messages on the ammunition as the probe was in its early stages.

This is statement from the WSJ

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

They're walking back a claim that was so stupid that it could only be made up by a conspiracy theory idiot.

Yet they made it. Too notch US journalism here people

Now they're somewhat walking it back but that doesn't matter, that walking back part will be ignored, the damage has been done

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So they walked back their own claim, good good good.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 hours ago

Make it, rile up the right, then admit later (quietly) that they were wrong. Corporate media standard.

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Probably the person making the more believable claim.