this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
487 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

82087 readers
4672 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth 86 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

uhhh. So would I need to get everyone who uses the household pc to verify age? Whats stopping a child from using the family pc that was age verified by an adult?

[–] loie@lemmy.world 75 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, straight to jail

[–] jjfolken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Underage 👇🏼, Overage 👆🏼... Jail.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

Birthday? Believe it or not, jail.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago

Please drink your age verification can....

[–] orange_narange@lemmy.org 31 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Clearly the point is not tl verify the age. They want your data.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 4 points 11 hours ago

They explicitly don't:

The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age, setting AB 1043 apart from similar laws passed in Texas and Utah that require "commercially reasonable" verification methods, such as government-issued ID checks. Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, who authored the bill, said this "avoids constitutional concerns by focusing strictly on age assurance, not content moderation," in a press release. The bill passed both chambers unanimously, 76-0 in the Assembly and 38-0 in the Senate.">