this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
453 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck AI

5751 readers
1490 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 49 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Am I allowed to have an unpopular narrative here?

There are levels of vibe coding, and it's possible to use AI without vibe coding at all.

If you're very targeted in what you're having the AI do and you carefully review the code, it can be a great tool.

For example, "make this html grid sortable and add a download button that creates a csv file." You know exactly what this does, it's self contained, and it's something you know can just be copied from stack overflow and applied to your code.

That works, and works well.

"Create an app that..." is vibe coded slop.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

For example, “make this html grid sortable and add a download button that creates a csv file.” You know exactly what this does, it’s self contained, and it’s something you know can just be copied from stack overflow and applied to your code.

Even if this works, you'll be stealing someone else's code without authorship attribution for anything that's a non-trivial algorithm.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

Most devs are already doing that. This just saves them the time of doing it for themselves.

[–] Jako302@feddit.org 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The copyright/license issues that come with it due to the current unregulated nature of ai are a completely different issue to the vibecode slop allegations.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago

no. it's one aspect of many. Using slop is ethically wrong AND it produces shitty code with zero innovation and creating technical debt.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 15 points 16 hours ago

It can be useful when an experienced programmer knows how to guide it, although you have to be very intentional or you'll end up wasting your time cleaning up after it.

That being said I think most people are upset that they're no longer declaring which parts of code are AI assisted