this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
651 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

82494 readers
4500 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When women riders and drivers told us they wanted more control over how they ride and earn, we listened. That feedback led to Women Preferences, features designed to give women the choice to ride with other women. Since our first pilots last summer, we’ve heard just how much that choice matters—from feeling more comfortable in the back seat to more confident behind the wheel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] elvis_depresley@sh.itjust.works -5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

~~this argument can be applied to other situations.~~

~~Uber for whites only: "This is a good thing if you ask most white racists"~~

~~The gas chambers: "This is a good thing if you ask most Nazis"~~

~~Just to be clear, I disagree with both the above situations, I just think it's not a great argument.~~

~~Just to be clear 2: I also sympathise with women who feel uncomfortable being driven by a man.~~

Editing because I've thought about it and changed my mind.

My analogies are incorrect; A Nazi or Racist isn't the same a man or woman or a skin colour.

The real issue is, you can't speak for "most women" or "most men" or "most anything" without citing a source.

Building tools that simplify discrimination isn't a good thing (my opinion).

If you think this is justified because "men are dangerous" then you are

  1. generalising
  2. not realising that people are not evil (source Humankind by Rutger Bregman).
[–] Never_go_full_regard@lemmy.today -3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

As a man, I want to EXCLUDE all women as potential clients. This is acceptable to articulate given the context, no?

[–] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

this place never fails with its reddit-isms and lack of nuance. If you want data, look at SA data and see the demographics of the victims vs the demographics of the perpetrators. This is a tool to give peace of mind and potentially lower SA on ubers.