this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
247 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck AI

5751 readers
1565 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (4 children)

3.4 megajoules = 944 watt hours

Microwaves are typically rated at 1200-1500 watts, sometimes more. Do they actually use that much? I'm not sure, stuff typically uses less than the rated power on the label.

That's like 2-4 miles in my electric car, depending on outdoor temperature.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's watts, not watt hours though, so it's like microwaving something for a little under an hour, which is unrelatable for most people.

But take your 300 watt gaming PC, play on it for 3 hours, suddenly you're at 900 watt hours and that's probably easier to picture for most people.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 hour ago

Except when you do that, you only get 3 hours of boring lame video games, rather than 5 whole seconds of thrilling slop.

[–] wazzupdog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

Ive seen more 700-1200 watt microwaves.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Thank you for the conversion. We have a common unit for electrical energy already, and megajoules is not it. Trying to make it sound like a bigger number by changing the unit only muddies the waters and honestly makes me slightly less sympathetic to the issue.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The way a headline was phrased makes you change your mind about objective truth...? This isn't a family feud where you're being asked to take sides. It's still climate change even if someone tries to trick you into thinking it's slightly worse than it actually is.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

Not speaking for the sponge, but I know it gives me pause to consider what else they may be manipulating, and also why they're manipulating it

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

Would any manipulation at all justify caring less about climate change? We know from a million sources that ai takes a ton of electricity

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)

@Cort@lemmy.world spoke for me perfectly. When you make things weird, I have to start by assuming malice or incompetence - both of which should be red flags.

No doubt AI is sucking a lot of electricity and that presents loads of problems to consider. But instead of (for example) 5 seconds being converted to an hour running a microwave (because who even does that?) how about 3 minutes being about as much as a typical American home uses in a day? Or something like that?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

You specifically said you became less sympathetic to this cause though. Even if you exaggerated by many times this would still be an issue, which you just admitted.

I get thinking it's a bad idea for people first learning about this, but it's not changing my mind exaggerated or not.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 13 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Seriously?

Joules are the SI unit for energy measurement. 1 Joule = 1 Watt second, so 3600 Joules = 1 Watt Hour

They teach this in middle school.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, but when it comes to electrical energy nobody uses "watt seconds" in the real world. Devices use hundreds of watts, and run for minutes and hours. Dividing by 3.6 million isn't exactly easy mental math to get the unit (kWh) we all see on our electric bills.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

nobody uses “watt seconds”

Joules. They don’t say watt seconds because they say joules.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

But they don't use that either in the context of real-world electricity usage. Maybe in the middle school classroom setting, when you can make up the numbers you work with, but when I'm trying to quantify how much energy something uses at home I multiply how many watts it uses by now many hours it's running. Divide that by 1000 for kilowatt-hours, and multiply by $.11 to know the cost to do it at home. If I need to do a multiplication/division of 3.6 million when nobody else is, something's not right.

Similarly, a meter is a standard unit for length, but we don't use it when measuring the distance to different galaxies because light-years are more practical at that scale. If you start using meters you'd get some funny looks, just as I'm feeling for joules instead of kilowatt-hours. But you know, "almost a kilowatt-hour" makes for a pretty boring headline.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, that's true, but joules typically isn't used today. When people talk about energy consumption it's almost always in watts or watt-hours. I've seen/heard people use joules less than 5 times since college.