this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
569 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck AI

6318 readers
1850 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theBATCLAM@piefed.social 128 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (41 children)

It's absolutely terrifying. I am a returning student to uni in my thirties and the only person not using any AI. They literally depend on it.

I just had a classmate the other day turn to me, frustrated, saying "You ever ask chat(gpt) a question and it gives you a whole, like, paragraph you then have to read? like, why can't it simplify it?"

Did I mention I am an electrical/computer engineering double major? So yeah, even reading is too much for these kids. Future workforce is fucking cooked.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

my older bro who is in tech, depends on it for almost every question he has or when he is ask a very simple question. asked him something about laundry last year, he said "use CHATGPT", theres really no hope for these people. and then later on ask what was causing "flies " to appear in the house, he kept using AI eventhough it was pretty giving inaccurate info,

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

my bro who is in tech refers to chatgpt as a go-to anytime he has a question or is asked a very simple question, yea pretty much screwed, and he think AI slop generated pictures are epitome of some kind of art piece.

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Future workforce is fucking cooked.

Yep, and I predict that programmers actually understanding code (and especially being able to quickly and thoroughly review code), are becoming increasingly valuable (again?) in the future, when someone really has to guarantee what the AI actually generated (and let me tell you there are still so many stupid things the AI does...).

[–] theBATCLAM@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago
[–] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

The new age COBOL programmers are anyone who can actually program.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I have a friend who was frustrated that his programming exam was too hard (Python) and stated " why do I need to learn this? I can just use ai and get the job done ". We're absolutely fugged.

[–] theBATCLAM@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's honestly disheartening. I understand our education system is not well in that tests aren't actually very condusive to learning, but they treat the idea of learning a skill like it's some obnoxious chore they just want over with so they never have to do it again when its like... bruh civilization/tech grows exponentially, y'all gotta learn your whole lives and it should be something you ENJOY it should give you pride to be good at something or understand a subject thoroughly.

i don't even know what to begin doing about this problem but even if you pretend the environmental impacts are fine/manageable, I can't help but think this shits gotta be destroyed for the future of humanity.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

learning isn't fun for the vast majority of people, it's painful and miserable. they want to avoid it as much as possible.

[–] pipi1234@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] theBATCLAM@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It genuinely feels that way yeah like idk what we do about this problem it's bad, however bad you think it is it's worse

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've seen some videos of Costco brawls between gen z men over Pokemon cards they want to flip. Surely the bar can't get lower then that

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago

i think thats a different situation, some people are greedy and think they can make money flipping cards which is pretty mucha problem with TCPi/TCPJ but they have very little incentive to fix that issue, MTG unintentionally remediated that issue by pushing out UB sets multiple times a year more than normal, essentially making older sets useless/or less useful as you have to keep buying the new sets to keep up. this is about people inability to think for themselves.

[–] theBATCLAM@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think, unfortunately, we are being lead by grifters creating a society of grifters i.e. the future generation is learning the lesson that the way to get ahead is by grifting.

I know this is gonna sound dramatic but if it keeps going? We're looking at apocalyptic outcomes for the future of civilization.

the future generation is learning the lesson that the way to get ahead is by grifting.

So basically how it always was?

There's a reason why there are billionaires...

But yeah it's likely getting worse, like an elite and otherwise brain-dead propaganda following society (to exaggerate a little bit...). Initially after reading Adorno years ago, I never thought that the rather negative way he wrote, and something like the third Reich will not happen again, yet here we are repeating mistakes, fueled by accelerating climate-change (and the resulting conflicts)...

We are leaving (or rather have left) the most peaceful era of humanity, back to smashing each others heads without a real reason, leaving a more positive holistic utopian future... Sad.

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It took me an embarrassingly long time to realize that the "chat" slang was short for ChatGPT.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no, it's for the chat audience in video streams

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah ok, didn't realize that was the original source. But now I wonder if it'll eventually be supplanted as a reference to ChatGPT.

[–] theBATCLAM@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

It depends on the context, it is slang for both. That's why I put the parenthesis. Don't be embarrassed, it's hard to keep up with slang.

[–] joan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

not true , young person here

load more comments (34 replies)