this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
37 points (91.1% liked)

Selfhosted

60911 readers
851 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
37
noob questions seeking non-noob answers (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by FEIN@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've been interested in self hosting a small variety of services yet I'm so confused on where to start. What would you guys recommend for a server machine?

My main uses (and some of the services I think are appropriate for the use case) are:

  • 1tb photo, video storage, push/pull (immich)
  • 512gb total shared between downloaded music storage (navidrome) and pdf/ebook storage (calibre)—all pull only
  • 1tb movies/tv storage on a media server (jellyfin)
  • 512gb storage for random junk or whatever, plus a file transfer push/pull (syncthing..? or nextcloud?)
  • potential basic bio website hosting (near future)
  • potential email hosting (distant future)

anyways with that all said i have a few questions:

  • what server should i buy if i want to expand storage in the future? should i just build a pc with like 3x1tb storage, or 6x1tb storage w/ redundancy? totally confused about the concept of redundancy lol
  • any thoughts on the services im suggesting? especially for file transfer

edit: im willing to learn anything cli-related, i already daily drive linux on my laptop and code in nvim if that provides any sort of reassurance lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Forester@pawb.social 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're going to want a NAS. Most consumer systems can only wire up four ssds/nvme ssds. If you want 6 TB of capacity and you want redundancy. That means that minimum raid one and 12 TB of capacity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels

[–] inanimate_carbon_rod@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

3 x 3TB drives in RAID 5 will get you (almost) 6TB with only 9 TB total capacity, and its more fault tolerant than RAID 1. Also, its cheaper to replace a single 3TB drive than a single 6TB drive, so it'll spread your costs out more.

I have 4 x 3TB drives on RAID 5, and I got three of them used for cheap at a local computer place. They'll have lower life expectancy, but unless more than one dies at a time, it'll be cheaper to replace them as they do. I got 1 drive new, and plan to replace 1 drive every year or two with new.

Unless you need speed, definitely consider HDDs, especially NAS grade. They're slower read/write, but your use case shouldn't need a lot of have read/write. HDDs--even the premium ones--are way cheaper than SSDs right now with the shortage, and have great longevity.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

3 x 3tb in raid5 can lose one disk of three. That is less redundancy than raid 1 on 2 disks, plus a write penalty.