this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
153 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

11731 readers
562 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

19% would be the complacent middle class 🤮

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 41 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the issue here isn't the middle class, it's as usual, the owner class that's the problem

[–] BrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

The middle class is their tool. They are incented to perpetuate this bullshit.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The middle class is like the personal carbon footprint - it's a fabrication created by the ultra-wealthy to divert responsibility from themselves. There is only the owner class and the working class.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 40 minutes ago

Except the middle class actually does own most stuff, and consume the most. The ultra-rich are rich, but there's just so few of them.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I respectfully disagree. The middle class is not perfect, but the issue here is the ruling class

[–] lesinge@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

How are you (OP) blaming the "middle" class? What could you suggest nurses, teachers, fire fighters, etc do to solve the problem of wealth inequality?

I genuinely want to know because it seems to me that we control nothing and have no excess to give.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world -4 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Stop performing those services. En mass.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You get that they'll just de-professionalize those roles and let untrained, unskilled hacks and quacks loose on the general populace, right? I mean you want to have your kids taught by some goof quoting Grok, and your grandma getting her life saving treatment from Bobby Kennedy approved witch-doctors that's where you end up if the professionals all decide to quit En Masse.

[–] lesinge@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Lol, too true 😁

[–] lesinge@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

...so let people die, stop caring for our neighbours, allow ignorance and illiteracy to fester. Seems extreme and misplaced.

A better, less-nihilistic approach might be: stop buying things, cancel subscriptions, sell dividend-paying stocks, etc. Or even better: a general strike.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

A general strike is stopping doing those services en masse.

[–] lesinge@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Yes, but it includes the whole population rather than a narrow sub-section. It would also send a much stronger message.

See what happens when CEOs and politicians need to wipe their own asses.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Who suffers the most? The vulnerable

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Do you mean "incentivized?" But yeah.

[–] BrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Incent is correct in fact 🤓

incent verb in·​cent in-ˈsent incented; incenting; incents transitive verb

: incentivize … a large prize … may also incent some employee referrals. —Bill Conerly

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Its definition is literally a reference to "incentivize," so all that proves is that language has rotted slightly

[–] BrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Not if you actually read the chart

[–] BrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"The earliest known use of the verb incent is in the 1840s."

???

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

If you read the chart, rather than just the AI summary, you'd see that usage was quite low until a slow rise in the mid-20th century.

[–] BrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I read the whole document akshully. No need to be so cranky.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago