this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
718 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

82810 readers
3768 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Altman’s remarks in his tweet drew an overwhelmingly negative reaction.

“You’re welcome,” one user responded. “Nice to know that our reward is our jobs being taken away.”

Others called him a “f***ing psychopath” and “scum.”

“Nothing says ‘you’re being replaced’ quite like a heartfelt thank you from the guy doing the replacing,” one user wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baines@piefed.social 28 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

everyone using ai says some variation of this

acting like they do proper code review on this ai gen code but we’ve had so many examples of how people well before ai carried massive tech debt and cut corners so I have zero faith

much less the numerous examples of slop laden bugs making it to live with major companies in the us

ai just amplifies and obfuscates the problem 

 

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You do you I guess. AI slop can suck a dick and we've fired people for less.

AI causes problems, AI can amplify problems, but AI can legitimately assist, too.

[–] baines@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago

imagine instead of ai it was your compiler

we all know they can have weird quirks but imagine the fail rates were like we are experiencing with current ai

would people keep these tools in their work flow?

if big business wasn’t so hard on to cut labor the answer would be a hard no

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Its because your perspectives clash. They are saying the problems you have are caused by people behaving poorly, and you are saying its because the AI is inherently flawed.

They do have a point, if I were to pick up a hammer and throw it through a window, I can't really blame the hammer for the broken window.

I do think we have to hold each other to some higher moral standard where we put people above profit, which would reduce a lot of abuse. Its astonishing that so many programmers would justify AI use knowing it may be causing harm to many others in their field.

[–] baines@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

except using your metaphor, everyone using the hammer has the same problems, and it is using said hammer as advertised, regardless of what we all know should be best practices

there have been multiple big fuck ups now and i think the reason why matters less than the fact the cause will not improve any time soon