this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
37 points (93.0% liked)

Selfhosted

60024 readers
983 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
37
Keycloak or alternative? (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by reabsorbthelight@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have a Talos k8s setup now and I'm trying to add various services. I have discovered that my old htpasswd file won't cut it for auth.

I want to host the following,

  1. WebDAV solution (currently sftpgo)
  2. Invidious
  3. *arr tools
  4. Bitwarden

Should I go with keycloak? Are there better auth services?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lovable_titty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Keycloak seems a little bit faster in my case, and it is simpler to setup. It has less containers.

However Authentik is has more features.

So, depending on your use case, I'd use one of those. Both are great!