this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
42529 readers
293 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Gee. God beware anyone answer the one interesting question. And that's whether the book / storytelling is any good.
I mean it's not surprising to me how random internet people disagree. They always do... But we could just ask a professional?! Book critic is a real job. They could tell us within a few hours if the book is any good. Or full of common story tropes. And "sudden plot twists" like when I tried writing a story with AI 😅 And whether it's going anywhere, or how it compares to other books which have some artistic quality or meaning to them.
I mean, lots of people thought 50 Shades of Grey was good. But no one I've run into in the kink community. Owner/pet is difficult to write even if you're familiar with the subject material; absent that, it's just another unrealistic portrayal for vanilla audiences.
I've lost respect for the NYT, but if their analysis is it was LLM-written, I'm satisfied enough that there were professionals on the scene. Whether it's any good is irrelevant to the problem at hand.
Hmmh. There's several questions here. Maybe I'd read some, if ChatGPT were able to write really good smut 😆 So it remains to be one of my questions.
But yeah. Not only NYT, the Reddit person who wrote a long post about it, also seems to know what they're doing.
Unlike, apparently, the "author"! 🤣
Ba dum tss...
By the way, the linked 3h YouTube video answers my question. It is poorly written. Already the cover art was stolen. And apparently there's not a single thing right about this book. I watched just the first few minutes and that's enough to tell.
I'd not bothered to watch it, but yeah, a few minutes gives you all you need.