this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
230 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

82886 readers
3083 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
230
Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations (www.techspot.com)
submitted 13 hours ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Early reactions to Nvidia's DLSS 5 were swift and skeptical, with some observers likening the technology to an Instagram-style filter applied over gameplay footage. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang refuted the allegations, but subsequent clarifications have helped outline how the system actually works – and where it can fall short.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is a culmination of years in which gamers kept getting ignored when they ask for some consideration to their needs like more memory, better Linux drivers, and smaller form factors. Instead we get hit with their server farm AI slop runoff and told this is what we want. To me it's an insult for wanting something that's more specialized to gaming and graphical work rather than some LLM platform.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Ahh,I get it now. It's not about them creating something that sucks, it's about them creating something that sucks instead of something else we've been asking for that would be actually useful. Thanks for filling in the missing piece.