Selfhosted

56958 readers

1384 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.
No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

467

I prompt injected my CONTRIBUTING.md – 50% of PRs are bots (glama.ai)

submitted 1 day ago by vegetaaaaaaa@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Relevant since we started outright rejecting agent-made PRs in awesome-selfhosted [1] and issuing bans for it. Some PRs made in good faith could probably get caught in the net, but it's currently the only decent tradeoff we could make to absorb the massive influx of (bad) contributions. >99.9% of them are invalid for other reasons anyway. Maybe a good solution will emerge over time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] TheHolm@aussie.zone -29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is one good article. I guess humans are now mostly redundant in open source. Bots can do everything themself, write code, submit PR, merge them and even blog about it. Time to book a place for myself in a graveyard.

[–] dan@upvote.au 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

... did you read the same article as everyone else? I can't tell if you're joking or not.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 21 points 1 day ago

Instead of a handful of quality PRs per day, the volume jumped to 20, 50, or more. At first I was happy. Then I started noticing patterns. The quality wasn't there.

Blindly promoting the LLMs without checking the source? Bot or human it makes you wonder if your contributions are worth keeping around

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You're probably exaggerating sarcastically?

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but in each joke there is bit of truth. Open Source have to change. Open Source code written by LLMs is still open source, but it drastically different from current one.
Instead of spending time to "scratch the itch and help others in the process" - now people should give money to corps to use LLM to to do same.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Honestly I have no idea what you're on about. But this

Open Source have to change.

sounds a bit too opinionated to me, with nothing to back it up. In other words: utter BS.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago

Time for QA