this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
148 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42557 readers
606 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not from the US. And I think the way they're trying to tackle it is stupid, roughly for the reasons you say. But on a surface level it's good that there is some action taken on this matter.

The country does matter. It allows oversight and regulation to a greater extent. And if it turns out that there's a backdoor in a router, if it's made locally there will be someone to criminally charge, whereas if it's made in China or wherever, that would be impossible.

Then again, it's the US, so they'd probably charge some random worker instead of the CEO who demanded the back door be implemented.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What kind of oversight are you talking about? Locally produced items do not need to fulfill more regulations.

If this was about cyber security there would be a mandatory certification (like there is for emc, like the FCC). But blanket statements like „foreign company bad!“ don’t do anything for increasing cyber security

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 6 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, items are licensed according to where they’re sold, not made. “More oversight” makes no sense.