this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
79 points (91.6% liked)

Canada

11794 readers
564 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 25 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

Just because the US launched one of the stupidest and least planned wars in a century, does not make the Iranian government good.

Just two months ago they were killing thousands of protestors.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The saudi regime is as bad we don't have any sanction on them. Israel is doing the worst crime in humanity a fucking genocide we don't have sanctions on the state itself. Any kind of sanctions in the war makes it harder for iran to defend itself for being genocided too. So please stop with your hypocrisy

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Ah, but the Saudi regime has dumptrucks full of money.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And just because the Iranian government is an ass doesn't give America the right to bomb them. Or why don't they go after every other country whose government does bad things. Sorry in this case the US is the "bad guy".

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago
[–] turdas@suppo.fi 12 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Iran was being sanctioned before the attack too. A lot of people act like any enemy of Trump is their ally, but this is not so.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

With the express and publicly stated purpose to bring so much physical economic pain to the people so that they revolt against the gov't.

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 0 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The alternative is to trade with the totalitarian regime, which serves to keep them in power. If you could support the people but not the regime then of course that would be the best course of action, but that is not how it works.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

We are trading wit an tolitarian regime called saudi arabia. It is not of canada goddamn business to force iraninas to take out their own regime. It ia not like Iran want to attack Canada.

We all know all the sanctions are there simply because Iran was made an enemy of the usa and israel

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You should check how sanctions are affecting the people of Iran and in general what outcomes regime-change sanctions have produced around the world. Also check under what conditions better governments emerge out of worse ones. Hint: it tends not to be under severe sanctions.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Nobody is claiming that. This is just an idiotic straw man. You don't have to support the government in Iran to understand that invading countries is wrong. What the fuck is wrong with you people?

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago
[–] turdas@suppo.fi 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I did not claim that starting a war on Iran was OK. I said that sanctioning them is OK. Sanctions on Iran should not stop just because of Trump's idiotic war.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The Lancet has published data concluding that US imposed sanctions cause the deaths of more than 564,000 people each year. More than half of the dead are children under the age of 5. If that's what you support, you're utterly sick.

[–] turdas@suppo.fi -2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

If open trade with, and therefore support of, a totalitarian theocratic regime that just killed tens of thousands of protestors is what you support, you're just as sick.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

The ten thousands of protesters numbers comes from iranint backed by saudi arabia. Not to say that the regime did not intentionally killed protesters. All the usa is responsible of millions of death and iarael is doing a genocide

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Way to try justify starving children fash.

[–] turdas@suppo.fi -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Iran doesn't have starving children.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Why? Borders are imaginary.

Marx knew that.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I am not a tankie and I have the same opinion cna you provide a real argument now?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

that must've sounded really clever in your head

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Am I wrong? You definitely can't see or touch them.

The USSR also initiated a few invasions.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Not only are you wrong, but you're also exposing yourself as not having any capacity for critical thought. If you bothered actually reading Marx, then you'd know that he never argued for abolishing the state under current conditions. You're like a chat bot quoting things without any context. Also, nice whataboutism there kiddo.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, he was expecting there'd eventually be a global revolution... that would disregard borders.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What he was actually expecting was that the contradictions of capitalism will cause the system to implode on itself, which is precisely what we see unfolding today.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He was pretty clearly not just writing about the English proletariat, or the German. Except there wasn't really a Germany the same way at all at the time, because borders are imaginary.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

The only thing that's clear is that you've never read Marx, and there's no point trying to have a discussion with somebody who's ignorant on the subject they're attempting to debate. I've already addressed your claim earlier by the way. You're just rehashing the same bullshit here like a parrot.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

People ruled by pedophile oligarchs don't get to decide which governments are 'good' and invade countries based on that.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Ok but who is being ruled by pedophile oligarchs? This is a Canadian sub. What is your point here, that we sanctioned Iran? While maybe we don't all wish that there's bombs falling on people's heads, at the same time the regime in Iran are far from sweethearts...

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

So when is Canada invading America? If not being sweethearts is the requirement.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is a post about Canada is supporting the attack on Iran by the Epstein coalition. Let me know if there's something else you're confused about.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Is it? It doesn't say "in response to the America-Iran war...". As the above poster pointed out, sanctions were occurring long before, and are continuing to occur after.

A war can have two villains. If you'd like to complain that Canada isn't placing sanctions on the US for things they've done, feel free. But that is not the argument you're making.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Iran was never a serious threat to the USA and not a threat at all to Canada . The USA was always a real threat to Iran from the day Iranians got rid of the Shah. If sanctions was always about human right abuses Canada would have sanctions on Iran during the Shah. It is pretty clear every single sanction on Iran is because of the usa and israel.

Any sanctions is reducing Iranians resources to defend itself against the USA and Israel who want to genocide them

A war can have two villains.

It is like saying both the European settlers in Canada and First nations was villains because first nations did terrible things to each others during wars

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The argument I'm making is that Canada is aligning with the burger reich genocidal policy, and I guess that's no surprise given that Canada itself is a colonial apartheid state.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Canada itself is a colonial apartheid state.

Was? Colonial settlement was not pretty, and our history is supremely fucked up, so while I dislike the use of apartheid specifically, the essence is there.

Is? Absolutely not. Fuck off with this propagandist take. You should be embarrassed to be comparing the genuine atrocities of the past/parts of the world with the current state of Canada.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The Canadian governments are constantly trying or doing breaches of first nations sovereignty

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

No, not was, it is an apartheid state today occupying unceded indigenous land. Don't pretend it's history. And not only is Canadian state committing crimes against native people here, but Canadian mining companies engage in literal slavery in Africa. https://theconversation.com/slavery-charges-against-canadian-mining-company-settled-on-the-sly-148605

You're either an utter ignoramus or spreading propaganda here intentionally. Either way, kindly take your own advice there and fuck off with your colonizer apologia.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Agreed, but this post is talking about Canada. Are you as confused about Canada’s sovereignty as Trump is?

Also, what’s up with the completely unrelated picture?

This is a bad post and a bad comment, man.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not confused at all about the fact that Canada has little practical sovereignty and acts as America's junior partner committing crimes around the world. What's up with living in a cave and not being aware of internet memes.

Also, I don't actually care what you think about my comment or post, man.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

You could have just said yes.

Funny that I’m the one living in a cave because I don’t keep up to date on meme culture. Get outside some time. People aren’t that bad.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sorry that nuance offends you and you need everything to be presented in infantile terms.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Do you even read what people say or just copy/paste from your prefab responses?

Too bad you can’t just ban me from here too, huh?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Yes, but have you considered the world is perfectly split into good and bad guys? /s

[–] Sepia@mander.xyz -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The government's repression and killing is still going on, and it will continue until the regime falls.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

Which is why it's bizarre we're supporting them throughout all their belligerence.

Oh sorry I thought you were talking about the US