196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
view the rest of the comments
Such stupid animals, why didn't they go extinct already. Going back in evolution.
Intelligence is not the “end goal” of evolution, it’s a trait (or several) that is expensive and not always worth the cost. What do pandas need intelligence for in their natural environment, and how the hell would they fund such a thing calorically off a diet of bamboo?
Evolutionary failure is not why they’re at risk of extinction (it’s human mass deforestation and breeding windows that work perfectly well in nature but don’t cope well with the captivity we forced upon them).
That’s not how evolution works, there is no backwards, because that would require a “correct” direction; all that matters with evolution is survival.
I know you’re probably joking, but I tire of this narrative more every time I see it. I find it to be arrogant in the extreme the way that we’ve destroyed panda habitats, blamed them for being unable to adapt to the captivity we subsequently inflicted on them, and then normalized the idea that they somehow “deserve” to go extinct for it when they were doing just fine before we fucked it up.
"I'm a bear. What am I going to eat? Oh wait, I know, I'm going to eat the thing with the lowest nutritional value possible."
I am against captivity of animals in general. The argument you complain about is not the argument I make.
Indeed I am.
Pandas are a political influential power for China, indeed we completely fucked up and pandas did nothing to deserve this fate.
The evolutionary process probably went much more along the lines of “I can sacrifice intelligence and many of my speed/fine motor functions and in exchange I gain a food source with zero competition”. That’s not a terrible trade, and it’s not particularly different from what something like a koala or sloth is doing. If the deforestation happened slowly, evolution could also probably unfuck the situation too, but we humans change shit too fast for evolutionary timescales to mean a damn thing.
Again, I understand you’re making a joke. But I’ve been hearing this particular “joke” for the better part of 20 years (and I’m sure it’s been going longer) and this “joke” has normalized a view on the situation that I think is highly skewed and massively egotistical. By making this joke you perpetuate this normalization, so I feel that it’s required of me to call it out. I don’t think you’re personally to blame for it or anything like that; this isn’t an attack. I just want to make clear the reality of the situation to anyone unfamiliar with how the common narrative differs from the real world.
I've enjoyed and appreciated reading both of your messages people.