this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

8151 readers
464 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm a dumb American and don't know who this is. He didn't really do that did he? What the fuck is going on.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He's one of the fathers of neoliberalism, and therefore a lot of the problems we all face today

[–] ChilledPeppers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I believe he is the one who coined the term, and if you read the text in which he did that, you will see that what we got is nothing even close to what he wanted.

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Neoliberalism would have come one way or the other. Doesn't matter if Milton Friedman was a Jack Burner or a Jan Wouters.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Neoliberalism would have come one way or the other.

That's a part of the lie that "capitalism is inevitable."

It's not. Just because the world is a certain way for a time, doesn't mean it has to be, and the world is never done changing and evolving.

The world we live in today is the result of millions of decisions that humans have made. Collective decisions, individual decisions, competing decisions, strategic decisions. It all adds up and substracts and the net result is the world we have today.

Capitalism isn't inevitable. Oligarchs only want you to believe that so you accept it as the so-called "real world."

Maybe Friedman wasn't the guy that made neoliberalism the dominant system today, but if we didn't have Reagan or Thatcher, we wouldn't have austerity for the poor and "trickle-down" supply-side economics as the main standard methods of political economy.