this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
1100 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

10404 readers
220 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. You can replace the addres of .x.com to xcancel.com in the address. https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
1100
I think about this a lot. Even if a person "only" got 300 views, imagine those 300 people in front of you staring at you. (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
102 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Not really, I would say I take them as intended.

In that case, you either take up votes as “I liked that, thank you” and downvotes as “I didn't like that”; or you take upvotes as "people come up to you to give you oral pleasure", in which case you can take downvotes as "calls you a cunt and punches you in the face".

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago

I think that's a weirder scale than the one I'm using.