this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
76 points (96.3% liked)

Flippanarchy

2368 readers
3652 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
76
¯-(ツ)-/¯ (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Without money, I would have to go to the chicken farmer, find out that he needs lumber, go to the sawmill, find out what he needs, and so-on until I find someone along the chain that actually needs my potatoes.

No, in a system of trust you'd go to the chicken farmer and say "hey can I have a chicken, I'll get you back however I can" and he gives you a chicken. Then you try to ways to help him out until you've felt you repaid your "debt". This is how exchange worked before money under tribal systems. Not every exchange has to be transactional, that's just something capitalism tries to instill in us.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes but you're saying exactly the same thing he's saying...

Then you try to ways to help him out until you’ve felt you repaid your “debt”.

So you have your debt to the chicken farmer. You try to find ways to help him, and he says: I don't really need anything much, maybe some lumber is the only thing I need. So now you go to the sawmill, get lumber from them, transfer the debt to them. But now you're in debt with the sawmill, and the cycle continues...

Your debt thing changes exactly nothing, you still need to go around until you find someone who needs your potatoes. It just changes the time at which you need to do it.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

People never have just one need, and you can also repay the "debt" with your labor not just other goods. He may say I need lumber, but you could say "I don't have lumber but I can help around the farm, I can cook you some meals, I can watch your kids, take your cows to pasture, etc.". If you are a productive member of society you or the person can find some way to repay the debt. If you are utterly useless to them then they won't give you the chicken or may give it to you as charity, but most people aren't useless. I can think of ten things around my house that pretty much any able bodied person could do and that would be helpful to me.

Also it doesn't have to be immediately exchanged, again this is built off trust. Maybe the farmer doesn't need help now but come harvest time he'll need some extra hands. Same with the potatoes, he may not need potatoes now but he'll probably want some eventually.

You can see this reciprocity in a lot of close relationships, especially within families. You may never exchange money with a person but you get stuff for them, make stuff for them and do stuff for them under the assumption that they'll get you back. It may not completely even out in monetary terms but your fine with it because it simplifies a lot of things.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but if you love growing potatoes, but you hate watching the kids, cooking meals, take cows to pasture, it's so much nicer to just be able to pay in potatoes than needing to do so much shit you don't like.