this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
347 points (87.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39459 readers
9110 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, tankies aren’t any more or less left. They’re just more authoritarian focused.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

You literally ban all tankies in comms where you can do it, you're abusing authoritarianism, there are literal banns in your comms with the description "upvoting while tankie" lmfao

Tankies aren't more left than anarchists by pure ideology, I'd argue we're matched there, we're just more scientific and less corrupted by cold-war propaganda.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, anarchism is about free association and likewise disassociation.

Authoritarianism isn’t “you can’t come into my house and do what you want” that’s a child’s understanding of the concept.

Bahahaha oh that’s cute. You try to force the human condition into something you think you can quantify and control and call that science?

And what? Tankies are 100% stuck on cold-war propaganda, anarchists don’t care for it and hate both sides. Meanwhile those losers yearn for Stalin.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

free of association

Funny how your communities have no problem accommodating western libs without any anti-imperialist ideas or rethoric. You choosing to associate with them instead of with actual socialists and banning us immediately even for upvoting a comment shows very well whose side you stand on.

You try to force the human condition into something you think you can quantify and control and call that science?

No, I approach history, sociology and economy as sciences instead of as vibes-based. I support the system that historically statistically fed the children, not the one that claims in theory it can feed the children without having prisons.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure sure buddy. How many children ended up orphans thanks to the gulags? Bet they received a quality upbringing. Oh and the gays in the gulags wanted to be there right?

That’s authoritarianism, not getting banned from a meme comm.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wont somebody please think of the poor princes??? How many kids had to grow up without their nazi collaborator dad there to guide them on the path of ~~fascism~~ anticommunism?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Everyone thrown in gulags was a prince!!!!!!1one

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

All those queers? Princes. All those different socialists? Also princes. Hundreds of kingdoms, with millions of dollars each.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

owned guess they didn't make it that far...

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

To be fair, there was excess repression during the late 1930s in the USSR, but people massively inflate the numbers and won't ever tell that only about 1/4 of prisoners in the prison system (whose acronym was GULAG) were actually politically motivated. People also don't understand that the harsh conditions in Soviet prisons were due to a Soviet-wide famine caused by the Nazi aggression:

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

prison system (whose acronym was GULAG)

Afaik not true. The average westerner may think so, but GULAG is an acronym for a specific part of the system.

copypasted my earlier commentif you would consult the chart from chapter 10:

The etymology of GULAG is: "the acronym of Гла́вное управле́ние исправи́тельно-трудовы́х лагере́й (Glávnoje upravlénije ispravítelʹno-trudovýx lageréj, “Chief Administration of Corrective-Labor Camps”)" emphasis mine, as it corresponds directly to the above, specifically the camps under the O.G.P.U. These are where those with harsher sentences were sent, as seen in the chart (3-10 years)

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago

Nice chart, thanks for the correction

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

right but this person isnt really the nuanced type, they're cherrypicking and so am I

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know, I know you from hexbear (this is my alt), I just try to engage with the highest level of intellectual honesty possible when I'm in lib instances because people have the idea that there's no honest analysis of the repressions within ML circles when it's exactly the opposite way.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

fair enough do you have that graph comparing gulag mortalities in the 50s to amount of DOJ prisoner deaths by any chance? It might be an even better illustration.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com -1 points 1 week ago

No idea to be honest, never seen that one

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And here we go with the cold-war propaganda :D called you from the first second.

Anarchism in Spain led to many, many more gays in concentration camps and murdered than in prisons in the former USSR because anarchism cannot historically defeat fascism! That's the authoritarianism you should be focusing on, especially in 2026 as we see the rise of fascism once again

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It’s called history, I thought you studied it? :D or do you neglect the parts of history that showcase how bad authoritarianism is.

If anarchism is to blame for a different system that came after it than Marxist-Leninism is to blame for the capitalist shithole that is Russia today.

Go choke on a boot, I got better things to do than argue with you.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ignoring the part where they're 100% right about spanish anarchists throwing people in camps because it's inconvenient for your bullshit lol, try again

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They also cape for Nazis by ignoring pograms and lynchings to suit their narrative.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago
[–] Riverside@reddthat.com -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If anarchism is to blame for a different system that came after it than Marxist-Leninism is to blame for the capitalist shithole that is Russia today

Literally yes, we Marxist leninists study history in order to prevent the same mistakes. That's why we have entire books devoted to the topic such as "Socialism Betrayed" analyzing the history and mistakes of the socialists in the USSR that led to its dissolution. Imagine engaging in honest criticism of your own ideology.

Still, Marxist Leninism brought 70 years of development and human rights to a former absolutist monarchy and saved its inhabitants from extermination at the hands of Nazism, and it still survives in many countries like Cuba, Vietnam, Laos or freaking China.

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

china

communist

Lol, lmao even

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

China is socialist, not yet communist, but it did and it does follow the principles of Marxism-Leninism.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The people's stock market. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Stock_Exchange

The people's billionaires. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_by_net_worth

Marx famously advocated for billionaires to hoard wealth and to have stock exchanges, he said that's the true path to communism.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Markets =/= capitalism

Read a book

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you were aware of the multiple tendencies within Marxism you wouldn't write such uneducated takes. Example: the mensheviks in Soviet Russia arguing for a prolonged existence of capitalism during the industrialization of the country.

Marx himself believed that socialism was only possible after a capitalist phase and that it was precisely capitalism's tendencies that would make socialism appear, and in turn give way to communism eventually. It was literally Lenin's contribution that proposed Socialism directly from a feudal economy (early 20th century Russia and China), and argued for Bolshevism as opposed to Menshevism.

God forbid China finds a way to socialism with a mixed market economy. Regardless: seeing your quarrels with markets and billionaires, you surely are a staunch supporter of the Soviet model and the Cuban project?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Marx himself believed that socialism was only possible after a capitalist phase and that it was precisely capitalism’s tendencies that would make socialism appear, and in turn give way to communism eventually.

(Emphasis mine.)

This isn't quite true. Marx believed revolution would happen in developed capitalist economies first, but not that this was absolute. See his famous letter to Otechestvenniye Zapiski:

Be that as it may, as I do not like to leave anything to “guesswork”, I shall speak straight out. In order to reach an informed judgment of the economic development of contemporary Russia, I learned Russian and then spent several long years studying official publications and others with a bearing on this subject. I have arrived at this result: if Russia continues along the path it has followed since 1861, it will miss the finest chance that history has ever offered to a nation, only to undergo all the fatal vicissitudes of the capitalist system.

Marx did cross out this paragraph, but you can see that Marx did not hold such a rigid, formulaic view of the progression in modes of production. That said, whatever came to Russia even without going through capitalism would still have needed to go through socialism to reach communism, they just did not need a period of bourgeois domination and profit above all.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You literally ban all tankies in comms where you can do it, you’re abusing authoritarianism,

authoritarianism is when bedtime, am i rigt?

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, they're a mod, they take the harshest action a mod can take which is banning, and they do this for literally upvoting a comment

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh no! What a shame. Oh well, moving on.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey, I'm not the one crying authoritarianism here, I'm just exposing the hypocrisy

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

authoritarianism is when the government that has real control over things that matter and uses it to control up. when a private citizen kicks you out of their club it's just called a disagreement.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

authoritarianism is when the government

Incredibly uneducated again. Authority is not only when government. Your boss dictating what you do under threat of unemployment is a strong form of authority prevalent in modern society that didn't exist in the so-called "authoritarian socialist" governments.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it's more about power balance. a mod on a forum has no real meaningful power over anything that matters.

"the government" is too narrow of a term, but it does need to be a person with power and control over others. right now corporations are the real centers of power in this world. they are largely authoritarian.

people saying they don't want to hang out with you is not that.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago

a mod on a forum has no real meaningful power over anything that matters

Fully agreed, just portraying their hypocrisy.

[–] deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Every successful country has to express some level of Authority to maintain its existence. Especially the USSR which, you know, defeated Nazi Germany almost single handedly. Was that them being “tankies”?

Another example, Vietnam would look like Gaza city if they didn’t express authority. Same with DPRK aka “north Korea “