Not like that matters anyway, since no one is there to enforces them. ๐
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
627 points (99.5% liked)
Flippanarchy
2348 readers
3639 users here now
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What the hell are you talking about? When did they ever assert the righteousness of what they have to do for business?
Did you reply to the wrong comment?
Inherently, no I didn't respond to the wrong comment, if you want to have a discussion about it I'm game (have to do, they made a choice, said it themselves)
I'm not trying to discredit you but I'm genuinely having a hard time parsing what you're saying.
What I quoted from you is not at all a valid reading of the original comment. And your assertion that all of their operation funds would be better spent on feeding people assumes that there would be operating funds at all if OP weren't working on a product that their investors believed would make profit for a return on their investments.
Which, you know, is the exact thing OP was lamenting: that they had to do a bunch of pointless side activities to get the funding necessary for them to keep making whatever they make.