this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
15 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42781 readers
412 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I heard that they require plaintext data to work. What are the other factors to this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steve@communick.news 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (21 children)

There is no real technical reason. They could be. It's just a matter of encryption while in transit and no logs. Proton does it.

The real reason most aren't, is that there's not much incentive to make them private. The data has potential value, so why not hold on to it.

[–] Sebeck012@feddit.nl 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

AFAIK you can only encrypt the connection to the AI and promise to not keep any logs, but the AI needs to ingest readable data. So whomever owns the hardware can see what's being fed into it. Yeah you can mix instances and chat history and not link the requests to any one person but it will never be completely private.

[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yes. All that's true when using a 3rd party AI engine.
That's why Proton is running their own, in house. The AI still needs plain text. But they can ensure everything is isolated and private.

load more comments (19 replies)