this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
1110 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

84043 readers
6079 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
1110
Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US government (www.gamefile.news)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Deep@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
165 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Two gamers have filed a class action lawsuit against Nintendo, alleging that the company will be unjustly enriching itself with any refund it secures from the U.S. government over widespread tariffs last year that, among other things, hiked the prices of Nintendo hardware and accessories.

“Unless restrained by this Court, Nintendo stands to recover the same tariff payments twice—once from consumers through higher prices and again from the federal government through tariff refunds, including interest paid by the government on those funds,” the suit states.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tharkys@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here is the thing. If they win, it's great for them. However, all the other companies are currently updating their legal documents to reflect that they will get any forms of reimbursement and not be passing them on to the consumer. Not only that, but they are not planning on reducing the price of any of the products. So, even if the tariffs dissappear, they still win.

The only way to win the game is to not play it.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm curious... what legal documents would these be? You don't have to sign a Terms of Service to buy a physical product. The unjust enrichment claim is just as valid/invalid unless stores like Walmart are going to start making you read a terms of sale agreement before entering the store.

[–] Tharkys@lemmy.wtf 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 1 points 22 hours ago

That's a terms of service/use for Amazon.com (so your account and purchase history), none of that applies to goods sold. This is entirely different than a purchase agreement that says they get to keep any government refunds.