this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6809 readers
3208 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
21
Death by A.I. (www.kenklippenstein.com)
submitted 1 day ago by CubitOom@infosec.pub to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The U.S. military’s secretive Special Operations Command plans to establish its first-ever center for AI-driven missions like targeted assassinations.

Autonomous warfare is all the rage at the Pentagon, where computers and artificial intelligence process intelligence data, select targets and then transmit kill orders to a waiting robot, or a “loitering” missile or airplane.

The new “Special Operations Autonomous Warfare Center” is referenced in the $1.5 trillion Department of War budget request to Congress this week.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lirton@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope that they, at least, partially remember John Cameron's work and will set reliable restrictions for AI. The last thing we need today is an analog of a Skynet...

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as a reliable restriction on a system that has a catastrophic failure rate of 1% per task (at best).

[–] Lirton@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

At very least, I hope that they will not give it access to ballistic missiles. Moreover to nuclear ones.