this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
420 points (95.9% liked)

Memes

55653 readers
417 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

On the one hand, I guess it's a more efficient packing of people into urban areas than having large green spaces. On the other hand, it's fucking depressing, and I think kids miss something in childhood without psuedo wild spaces to go explore alone.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Actually maintained soviet apartment blocs aren't nearly as depressing as the ones taken in winter, that haven't been maintained properly since the dissolution of socialism:

These apartments provided housing for people that lived largely in shacks, where smoke from heating caused early deaths:

Soviet city planning made things walkable, with schools, playgrounds, and greenery within walking distance from nearly every apartment.

[–] CommieKhinkali@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

exactly! i grew up in one of those commie blocks and it was genuinely nice. sure, i didnt have my personal room, it is like a 2 room house but still its pretty good because of its location. theres greenery around me, theres playgrounds, idk and it was built in the 70s or 80s and is still holding strong even after decades of regular earthquakes, some of which where like 7.0-8.0 rating. ive moved from there to a newly built apartment but i still prefer that one even tho this new house is twice as big.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Sounds really nice!

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've seen you post the last one before, what's the source for it?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I believe I originally found it while looking for similar images. A good bit of info on housing I know came from Hakim's video on soviet housing. I'd love to have a primary source document to reference, such as a newspaper or book, but for images I usually grab them from internet searches.

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It seems it might be "The People's dining room in the Nizhny Novgorod region" by Mikhail Dmitriev

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting! I'll have to check that out later, thanks comrade!

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's hard to find anything about it on the english internet, there's a bit more on the russian it seems, but it's harder to navigate it when you don't speak the language.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Yea that's entirely fair. One day for me, maybe, haha.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be clear, I think the homes being made fun of in the original picture were supposed to be Western homes. They certainly look like many subdivisions in the US.

I haven't actually seen propaganda about Soviet housing. The pictures you posted just look like the poorer areas of any western city. We stayed in La Mina (on accident) when we visited Barcelona. Your pictures look better than La Mina!

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I grew up in a Soviet apartment bloc, and I did way more exploring outside than kids living in suburbia could ever hope to. For one, it was completely safe to let kids go out and play on their own. There were always green spaces and playgrounds between a few apartment buildings, and you'd go and play there.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can confirm. We used to play till 10PM (cause we had to wake up early for school) around the apartment bloc and around the neighbourhood. In the pre-cellpone era parents would call their kids from their balconies to come home. At the height of organized crime that arose post-1989, people felt that safe about their kids playing unsupervised.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's kind of unthinkable today honestly. I don't know anybody who'd just let their kids out on their own, and you'd probably get charged with neglect if you did.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A friend got in trouble for letting her kids play IN HER SUBURBAN BACKYARD without her watching them. A neighbour called the authorities.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Kids are basically treated like pets nowadays.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you're talking about the OP image, it's actually inefficient as fuck. The houses depicted there house the same number of people as one or maybe two apartment blocks. And those apartment blocks can then have a bunch of greenery between them.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

And the space can be more walkable, with grocery stores, schools, clinics, and more nearby.

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think you just need well-placed parks in the urban areas. I think it's worth asking ourselves why we don't really hear people bemoan the upbringing and experiences of kids from really urban cities like NYC or Tokyo. But when it comes to Soviet apartment blocs, this becomes a real concern. I think it's a double-standard that's been propagandized onto us.

Notice the multiple "I thinks" -- it's not like I'm out here doing surveys on the topic. This is just how it seems to me.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I don't know about Tokyo or what the options really are for raising kids in Japan. But I think (I'll join you here with spewing opinion/ conjecture everywhere) in the US a lot of people intentionally leave cities once they decide to have kids. When you are a young professional in your 20s, it's still very popular to live in dense urban centers, but then as you get married and start having kids, the vast majority of people move out to the suburbs or more rural areas. Now, obviously this is a privileged class of people, and maybe there are different trends in socioeconomic classes above and below them. And perhaps they move out of the city for other reasons (the price of housing, the quality of schools, etc), but I think access to nature also plays a part. But I say this as a girl scout troop leader, so I'm definitely biased.