this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
591 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

84074 readers
3713 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] loics2@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Because the performance of brave lib is a little better since it doesn't go through the plugin API

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So should you use this now? Or keep uBlock origin? Or enable both for maximum protection?

[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

it's up to you which one you wanna use, I'll keep using uBlock origin (both is overkill, you only need one for blocking ads)

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

I guess my question is more, is the “brave” one as good as uBlock? Or does it miss some things? Sounds like performance is better.

My only thought about using both would be if the “brave” version is more performant, but less protective, it could quickly get rid of most of the ads, and let uBlock get the rest, reducing how many are filtered at greater performance cost. But I’m sure that’s based on a gross misunderstanding of how it all works.

[–] polle@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Is it? Like YouTube is less laggy with that? Thats the only situation where i see actual delays by adblocking

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 3 hours ago

I use brave as my YouTube browser and it does seem to perform better than Firefox with unlock. There's frequently weird delays with Firefox where the ads get through a little and are then blocked(admittedly I probably only update it like once a month). I don't get that with Brave.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Yes, it is. No, the delays on Youtube don't come from the performance of the adblocking code, so you won't notice many differences. But more efficient adblocking is good for everyone - noticeably more so on devices with batteries, but still helpful for everyone.