this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
644 points (91.5% liked)

Political Memes

9571 readers
2481 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

you get to choose one, and only one:

the progressive voting block don’t deserve a candidate because they are too few to matter.

or

the progressive voting block not voting against their interest is why the democrats lost the election.

you can’t have both.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the progressive voting block don’t deserve a candidate because they are too few to matter.

I am a progressive. We deserve a candidate. So fucking show up to the primaries next time.

Watching Bernie get a fucking quarter of the vote in 2020 was heartbreaking.

the progressive voting block not voting against their interest is why the democrats lost the election.

You do realize that the election was lost by under 2%, right?

Would you like to extend that logic, that any interest group that can sink a candidacy is also entitled to dictate to the party whatever terms it likes, and holds no responsibility for the outcome if the party does not sufficiently compromise with them, in their view?

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

If you want support from people, you have to give them SOMETHING besides just not being the other person. Continuing unyielding support for genocide (but maybe occasional giving them 10 bombs instead of 20) and telling people that human rights are for states to decide is the exact opposite of giving those voters ANYTHING.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

the progressive voting block not voting against their interest is why the democrats lost the election.

Wasn’t the question to explain that part?

I’ll start. The Dem platform did not promise to end capitalism immediately. They specifically planned to continue it.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

most of them dint vote, actually the younger voters for both sides voted less than millennials and older.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

right, the question is why. and if the argument, such as what pug -constantly- expouses, is that the progressives cost the democrats the election by not voting hard enough.

if you are saying that the non voters may not care either way, or are balanced on both sides or across the spectrum, then you essentially are claiming that progressives do not deserve a progressive canidate because they do not have enough people. which would mean arguments like pug’s, condemning progressives for the failure and NOT the DNC, is wrong.