this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
587 points (96.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39666 readers
4720 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Depressed autistic transbians commiserating about loneliness

"Aw cute puppygirls!" head pats

Depessed autistic cis guys commiserating about loneliness

"Ew gross incels, yuck!" social stigma

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The difference being that the puppygirls aren't lashing out and demeaning others ... they're just bed rotting while watching yaoi

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lots of lonely guys aren't lashing out and demeaning others either, but people don't notice them because they're not lashing out and demeaning others. They still get labeled as incels though, and if they find that hurtful then people will absolutely shred them for it anyway.

Also, they'll be shamed for bed rotting, and shamed for watching yuri. No matter what they do, they'll be shamed for it. So it's honestly not surprising when a number of them end up lashing out.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Are people calling those who don't behave like assholes "incel" though?

And do you think that women are not judged if they behave in the femcel manner?

It seems like you're applying a double standard, there.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yes, people do call even the ones who aren't being assholes "incels." It's a derogatory term that gets used against anyone who doesn't get laid. Like calling someone a "virgin." It's shitty, and it promotes toxic masculinity. It also objectifies women by implying that men need to "get p***y" in order to be worthy of basic respect.

And I'm tired of hearing this excuse that "it doesn't refer to literal involuntary celibates, it refers to redpilled misogynistic jerks." But that simply isn't true, because people definitely apply it to literal "involuntary celibates" and use it as an insult like calling someone a "virgin." It's childish and immature. Also, there are lots of misogynistic jerks who get laid. Focusing all your ire on "incels" misses the point entirely, lets those people off the hook, and perpetuates the issue by communicating the subtext that "you can be a misogynistic jerk as long as you get laid, and then we'll still respect you." If you can't see how that's toxic and detrimental to society, then I can't help you.

And do you think that women are not judged if they behave in the femcel manner?

They're more likely to be fetishized, which is bad in a different way. But it certainly hasn't risen to the level of a cultural pastime like shaming incels has.

It seems like you're applying a double standard, there.

I'm not the one applying a double-standard. I'm pointing out the double-standard.

I never said "femcels should be shamed, and incels shouldn't be."

I said "femcels don't get shamed the same way incels do."

If the former is how you interpret the latter, that's on you. If I need to explicitly state what I meant, it's closer to this:

"Maybe nobody should be shamed for being lonely and having poor social skills, regardless of gender."

If the issue is misogyny, target the misogyny. Not the inability to get sex, because that is going to do nothing to address the misogyny.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All well said and more articulate than I could pull off, bravo.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've had to put a lot of thought into this over the years, because usually anything I say about it gets deflected into a strawman and then I just get called a redpilled incel and suddenly people assume that I'm making demands on women's bodies, when all I'm demanding is the same baseline level of respect that literally everyone else deserves.

So I have to navigate the argument very delicately, or else people assume I meant things that I didn't say.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

And then people call you an incel anyway, because it's such an incel move to defend people who get called incels, and they didn't read the "wall of text" (a couple of paragraphs) anyway.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

From that wall of text, I'm going to surmise that "incel" has been used as a pejorative towards you, with a reason that you're blind to

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

From that dismissive answer, I'm going to surmise that you leap to conclusions about people and throw around "incel" as an insult because it makes you feel powerful to punch down on people with poor social skills.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've never used that word as a pejorative. In fact, my favourite regular was a man who found himself unable to socialise with women

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Okay, you're just assuming I'm blind to some reason that you assume people have to call me that pejoratively, as you assume they do. You don't actually use it pejoratively, just strongly insinuate it. Got it.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh no, I think you're a self-centered prize dickhead.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're the one who made this conversation about me, so calling me self-centered feels a bit like a really shitty attempt at entrapment.

You clearly give so many shits though, to still be carrying on. But going off the responses by people who actually read what I said in my "wall of text" that you didn't read before firing off insults, they seemed to think it was an articulate and well-reasoned argument.

So maybe you're the dickhead?

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Huh? Oh, you're still here? That's weird...

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I just think it's weird that you care so much about punching down on people you view as lesser. Like you seriously must really enjoy insulting people who already don't do well socially.

It's not really the fact that you're commenting that's weird, it's the malice that you do it with and the fact that you apparently don't have anything better to do than demean others. And how you try to do so with this pretense of moral superiority.

I'm just glad I don't have to live with so much hatred in my heart. That sounds heavy. I kinda pity you, actually...

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If I enjoyed punching down on men who have problems getting laid, why would I have enjoyed fucking so many of them?

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So does "social skills" = "getting laid" in your opinion?

Because I only mentioned social skills, and you seemed to make the leap to "getting laid."

That sounds like a you problem.

Also, I don't care who you fuck or how much you enjoy it. It's kinda weird that you're trying to use that to justify being an asshole.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It means that those guys are no longer incels, by definition

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So what? So you admit that the definition of an incel is just "someone who doesn't get laid"? And yet you use it as an insult because... why, you're just immature? You believe people who don't have sex don't deserve the same respect as everyone else?

You're really only proving my point, and being an asshole unnecessarily.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago

I haven't used it as an insult

[–] DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hmm yes they often are even when they are just complaining that they disdain the situation. I don't know about women though I don't know that many that are bed rotting

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If they can look up Yaoi, bed rot, or even have the energy to complain about men, they are underemployed. I can't even think about sex without realizing I could probably pull it off, but my job would get in the way of it, as with anything. The workplace is our god, everything, even family is secondary, because you can't have family without work.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Anyone who has more free time than they spend sleeping is "underemployed" in your opinion?

You sound like a severely sick and twisted individual.

I feel sorry for your family, if you have one.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My family would not be around if I didn't work. They would not have survived. If you can do these things, you are clearly privileged, and could be doing better things with your time.

I will not be sorry, why should someone else make a hissy fit over "boo-hoo no one wants me".

I literally can't even muster the energy to think about that lesser shit, because I'm actually fighting for my life.

While these fuckers parasite around.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's a perfectly reasonable expectation to have that people should be able to make a decent living while still having enough free time to spend with family and loved ones; or in the absence of a family, doing whatever one chooses to do in their freetime, up to and including commiserating with others about their loneliness.

If you don't agree with that, then you're not a friend of the proletariat. You're licking oligarch boots if you think everyone else should have to work every minute of their waking life to survive just because you do.

If you really have to work that much, and you think the problem is that not everyone else has to work as much as you do, instead of the problem being that anyone should have to work as much as you claim to, then you're a fucking class traitor and a corporate shill.

I don't give a fuck if you think other people are "lesser shit" or that their problems don't matter. And if that's honestly how you feel, then I don't give a fuck about your problems either, because solidarity isn't a one-way street.

You can call it a "boo-hoo hissy fit" every time someone mentions a problem they face that you don't care about, but don't expect any fucking sympathy when you're the one complaining about your problems, as you're doing now.

Feel free to call people parasites for not living like slaves. That's the rhetoric fascists use, so at least you're taking the mask off.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why should I not be a fascist if I'm judged only by my immutable characteristics, if the world wants me gone, what incentive do I have not to be the same?

I have been holding back, putting up with bullshit, being kind to people who treat me like dirt because I believed in giving people a chanc. Then they go vote in the Jeffrey Epsteins, and try to exterminate those like me.

You get what you fucking deserve!

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Why should I not be a fascist if..."

That's something only a fascist would say.

if I'm judged only by my immutable characteristics

What immutable characteristic do you think you're being judged by? I don't know anything about you or your immutable characteristics.

I'm not judging you for any immutable characteristics. I'm judging you for being an unsympathetic and pretentious asshole who wants to be a part of the problem instead of part of the solution. You want to tear people down to your level, not lift everyone (including yourself) up to a baseline level of dignity and respect. That's why I'm judging you.

if the world wants me gone, what incentive do I have not to be the same?

That's basically the same rhetoric that zionists use to justify genociding their neighbors. Are you agreeing with them by saying it's a valid argument?

I have been holding back, putting up with bullshit, being kind to people who treat me like dirt because I believed in giving people a chance.

I could sympathize with that. I've felt the same way for a long time. But that's no excuse to start punching down. Direct your anger at the source of the problem, not at your fellow victims just because they're easier targets.

Then they go vote in the Jeffrey Epsteins, and try to exterminate those like me.

Yes, that's a problem. Focus on that, not on lonely guys on the internet who are trying to find a sense of community in some of the only places that actually accept them.

You get what you fucking deserve!

You're projecting a lot of weight onto me with that statement. Weight that I haven't earned. I won't sit by and tolerate you treating me like a maga asshole despite the fact that I've done everything in my power to resist their return to power. You don't know shit about me.

If friendly fire is your only tactic, go join the fascists and be self-destructive over there.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No point talking here anyway. People only comprehend certain things when they feel it raw themselves.

Then maybe you will understand why Incels and Femcels are actually an afront. To be so coddled that you have the gal to feel entitled to other people dating you, while the world burns, while there are more important things out there.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You're missing the point entirely. And I'm not going to rehash everything just to explain how.

Oh, but what I will say is that people who are isolated are fractured and weak. A bunch of isolated individuals can not present a very strong resistance. So one would think you'd have more sympathy for people trying to find community, even in small ways.

But if you're just going to call those people coddled (by whom? Who's coddling them, if they're isolated and lonely? Bad logic) and pretend it's about entitlement and not the empirically verified deep-seated psychological need that all humans have for camaraderie and socialization, then I can't really help you and I'm not gonna waste my time trying.

So go on, keep punching down on the vulnerable, while you're focusing all your ire on them instead of the problems that you claim they should be focused on (as if people can't consider about more than one problem?).

People only comprehend certain things when they feel it raw themselves.

Self-awarewolf, eh? You're the one here complaining that other people have problems that you don't care about or sympathize with.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trust me, I learned not to want or need people, it is a choice and not a need. And if you constantly desire things while you are still insecure, you will just hurt more.

Better to cut the scab early. Quit coffee as soon as you can, quit YouTube, become sober, focus on self-improvement, stop depending on people.

The sooner you do this, the less you will hurt.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The sooner you do this, the less you will hurt.

You certainly seem like you're hurting.

[–] brave_lemmywinks@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The fact they're mostly trans take the appeal from me.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I mean, you don't have to be attracted to anything you're not attracted to. No one is saying "you have to like puppygirls!"

The point isn't to fetishize femcels. The point is that double-standards are a problem that maybe understandably lead to people feeling left behind by society.

Maybe "incels" have a legitimate reason for feeling discontent after all, and it's not "because women tell them no" like people claim. More like "because people ridicule them for being alone."