this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
912 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

84356 readers
3535 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Full Report(PDF).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Or, ya know, make parents take responsibility for their own children and monitor what they are doing online. If you don't want your kids seeing or participating in things online then don't give them unfettered access to smart phones and computers!

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I kind fo agree and kind of don't. I agree in that parents should take accountability for their children. That said, social media has been shown to be addictive and kids are frequently ahead of their parents technologically. One thing that could help is an education campaign that teaches parents how to effectively monitor their kid's online activity. Parents need some help figuring out what tools to use and how to use them I think.

[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

You are correct and I'm a little upset at myself that I left out the fact that educating parents should be something we put money and effort into as well.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 0 points 16 hours ago

Good point. Kids know too much and get addicted too early. Adult know too little and can’t tell the difference between lies and reality. Everybody consumes way too much porn. That’s it, everybody put their phones in the garbage. No more Internet, everyone gets a landline, rotary dial, call on the other end does’t disconnect if you don’t hang yours up.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I agree, letting parents do their job of parenting is the best way to deal with this. But the problem is that that's very difficult, and they currently lack adequate tools.

The best method would be to make sure operating systems support parental controls that parents can set, and require websites to respect those settings (and browsers to support an API passthrough of the OS setting). That way there's no need to do any age verification that sends sensitive data like ID or faces to third-parties with sketchy privacy policies.

Unfortunately, when moves were actually taken to implement this kind of solution, reactionaries pushed back and made sure it didn't happen.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Which move are you referring to? Because most of them include far more than that.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 1 points 1 hour ago

Some guy put a PR in to the Linux kernal and to systemd, IIRC. The community pushback was huge, despite it literally just being a field users could fill in themselves if they wanted.

I'm not sure if he ended up succeeding. IIRC last time I checked it was in systemd but not Linux, but that could have changed and I could be misremembering.

[–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Combine both and demand parental controls for devices and services. The isp is paid for by an adult that's the only age check websites should need. Parents should have easily accessible tools to mark a os or browser as used by a minor.

[–] p4rzivalrp2@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

Wifi/router side parental controls are laughably easy to get around