this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
606 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25292 readers
3019 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, Donald Trump has leaned on all-caps social media posts to grab attention online.

His Truth Social feed often reads like a never-ending shouting match. However, that changed after Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) began mocking the president’s style in dozens of posts interspersed among his regular missives.

This has been going on for the better part of a week, and seems to have gotten to Trump’s ego, as his latest Truth Social posts aren’t in his classic all-caps style.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mormund@feddit.org 102 points 18 hours ago (9 children)

The Newsom hype is a bit weird tbh. Like anything is better than Trump. But please America do better than business as usual...

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

I don't idolize Newsom, but he's doing something. No one else is. Credit where credit is due.

No matter what, he's orders of magnitude better than Trump. He's also white, male, and straight and America has a big problem voting for anyone that doesn't meet that criteria.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 112 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

It's because he's the only one actually doing anything. It sucks that he's the one who is doing it, but we should be encouraging the behavior instead of shitting on the only person giving Trump the middle finger.

Is he perfect? Hell no. But don't let perfect stand in the way of good. Well, maybe not good, but not a genocidal fascist.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 38 points 15 hours ago

This. He's not a progressive dem, and he won't win me over against mostother candidates. However, how he is getting under Trump's skin should be a blueprint for every other D out there if they want a fighting chance in the midterms and forward.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

My one hope there is that Dems will pick up on the fact that the only people getting noticed in their party are the people who are at least fucking trying.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 12 hours ago

"Stop trying so hard, people are noticing and it's making the rest of us look bad" ~establishment Dems, probably

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

It's also likely because all of the billionaires running media companies want him as the next Dem choice, so his headlines stick around.

Plenty of Progressives make noise, too, but they're never given any screen time.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I bet a lot of people would love to get back to business as usual as a pit stop on the way towards progress.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 23 points 17 hours ago

"Business as usual" is what led us here, and what causes what we are seeing today.

If we go back to that "as a pit stop", we'll be back here in about 4 years.

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

See the oil industry and their lie about Methane(sorry, "Natural Gas") being a "transition fuel"

[–] griff@lemmings.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

selling methane as ‘natural gas’ is one of the very best marketing ploys ever

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Natural gas is not entirely methane (though it is almost), and the name 'natural gas' was to differentiate from 'coal gas'/'town gas', not to obfuscate what it was

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I imagine him as a very useful tool at the moment.

...because he's a tool, you see.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah I hate the Newsom hype. So many people just forgot or don’t care that he invite people like Charlie Kirk onto his podcast and agreed with them on transphobic talking points. Even if he’s just trying to do it to appeal to republican voter it’s really stupid. Their voters don’t want a fascist-lite when a full on fascist is right there. All he does is drag the democrats further right and normalize transphobic talking points. Which leads to violence and more deaths like what happened with Nex Benedict.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

agreed with them on transphobic talking points

I decided to check the actual podcast with Kirk and see what's the transphobic statement he made.

Here's the video, 22:20 onwards, it goes on for a while.

We can discuss the details, neither do I like his response overall, but you're massively overblowing and demonizing his position. Anyone can check for themselves. If this is how you think a transphobic fascist-lite sounds, if you think he would actually appeal to any republican voters thanks to this response, you must have a very caricatural understanding of politics and society.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 7 points 16 hours ago

Also his talking points on Palestine are wild. Dude is exactly why the democrats didn’t get in last election. Doing all the same shit.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It’s really sad how many people are just perfectly okay with letting me and other trans peoples rights be taken away because Newsom said a few funni things. It’s really upsetting how people in general on the left are transphobic but claim to be supportive. It’s incredibly frustrating watching people tell me I should support Newsom even though he is vocally against my rights. Sorry I don’t want to have to choose between a fascist who wants to blame and attack my people and a fascist-life who wants to blame and attack my people.

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago

It fucking sucks. He has the veneer of a slightly progressive Democrat, then pulls shit like platforming flat out nazis like Charlie Kirk. And playing into anti-trans fear mongering. Well and being blase about homeless erasure and other crap.

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"You can always trust Americans to do the right thing, after they have exhausted all other options."

We need actual like, American rebuilding from the ground up change. But for that to happen we need actual, America is completely broken and people are going hungry. Until that time we will keep going back and forth between "normal" and fascist, with the "normal" slowly creeping towards fascism anyways.

So we will probably go back and forth a few more times because Donald Trump will die happily of old age soon, and Democrats will claim a quiet victory and pretend nothing bad ever happened. Reverse a couple meaningless law changes. Keep the rest. And then be shocked when the new Donald Trump takes the reins.

We won't ever as a country look ahead and be like "ah yes, that is the correct course of action. It's okay to lose some profits now because the long term prosperity of the nation is what's important." We always try the easy but wrong path first.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

I'm worried about the possibility of more violent ends, but in reality I think you're dead on the money. After the orange turd kicks the bucket we are going to waffle back over to "normal" where we are only getting fucked over quietly, rather than right in our face.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If you’re expecting American liberals to learn the lesson this presidency has taught them, I wouldn’t bank on it. Get ready for a Newsom presidency, and then get ready for another weird fascist one immediately after.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think people need to abandon the idea that we will go from being a far right country to a socialist or progressive one overnight. We didn’t get this far right in one election cycle, we crept this way over time. You want to see big progressive change? Start doing what you can to move the country left, but don’t do something out of spite that the country isn’t moving left fast enough that makes it more likely that the country moves right.

If Newsom is the candidate, vote for him. Then put a ton of pressure on him to enact meaningful progressive policy change. And elect as many progressives as you can to Congress. But, if a neoliberal is on the ballot against a fascist, show up and support the neoliberal. And, raise up and empower progressive media. And, actually get out there yourself and be part of all this.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

lol we already tried that ever since I’ve been alive. Liberals will not help enact political pressure and will actively fight us.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 1 points 59 minutes ago

We’ve had progressive moments in this country though. That’s how we got national parks, labor laws, and social security.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The country is clearly not ready for a woman, much less a woman who isn't white, so business as usual is the only thing that'll work. Literally anything is better than trump, I'll vote for a ham sandwich if it comes down to it. everyone better get used to that idea, otherwise we end up with Trump 2.0 again because liberals decided to not vote again for a dumb fucking reason.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Not ready? Or just being petulant? It sure sucks that things have to be strategically discriminatory to stop the current trajectory of things.

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Sorry, the best we can do is vote in mostly reckless people in ot for themselves or old people who should be in a home but somehow got into the house... and senate