this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
589 points (98.8% liked)

politics

25284 readers
3059 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, Donald Trump has leaned on all-caps social media posts to grab attention online.

His Truth Social feed often reads like a never-ending shouting match. However, that changed after Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) began mocking the president’s style in dozens of posts interspersed among his regular missives.

This has been going on for the better part of a week, and seems to have gotten to Trump’s ego, as his latest Truth Social posts aren’t in his classic all-caps style.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Republicans in Texas attempted to push through a mid-decade redistricting map

Past tense? I thought this was going ahead.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 49 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It's good knowing the leader of the most influential and powerful nation on the planet is easier to manipulate than a child.

So, basically, like all conservatives.

If you haven't already, make sure to grift your local conservatives. Get them in on a pyramid scheme. Tell them you're a Nigerian prince and need a small donation that you'll return with interest once you've retaken your kingdom. Swindle them in any way you can. They're stupid and they will fall for it. These are traitors to our nation and the less money they have, the less financial support they can provide to their favorite felon rapist pedophile.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They're not all dumb, unfortunately. Some of them are just amoral.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

And many are immoral.

[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

easier to manipulate than a child.

Putin sure knows it.

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 26 points 7 hours ago

Bully the bully into submission!

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 60 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

I know it’s gonna sound like beating a dead horse but this is what the democrats should have been doing since 2016. We all know how thin skinned and stupid trump and the GOP are and that they will always fall for meme and troll posts. Idk if it will help but this needs to be adopted by everyone who thinks they have a chance of winning against this republican regime.

[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They tried that with the "weird" thing until they abandoned it in favor of their usual tactic of attempting to defeat an army of shit-smeared fascist memelords by appealing to suburban wine moms who think Jimmy Fallon clips are bleeding edge humor.

They should have stuck with it. It drove conservative fucking batshit when they couldn't frame themselves as the "normal" ones.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They would've lost either way. People were blaming democrats for covid-related inflation and ignored any positive thing biden admin might have done.

[–] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

If Biden had done any-fucking-thing we wouldn’t be here. That’s what happens when you reap what the neoliberals sow.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 minutes ago

What do you mean? He wrote a strongly worded letter! /s

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 58 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

this is what the democrats should have been doing since 2016

I kinda thought they should have prosecuted Trump and his known associates for their litany of criminal actions.

But I guess making fun of them online from the office of the largest and most influential state in the country is also cool.

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Fwiw i agree, however also: why not both?

Im a little tired of the high horse shit, and see the democrats as enablers of facism (doesn't matter if it's intentional or not really, the result is the same)

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

why not both?

Can't hurt. But one's treating the symptom and the other is treating the disease.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Non zero chance you are controlled opposition by choice or being led like a reactionary

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Wasn't he impeached him twice but the Senate didn't convict? How else should prosecution have been done?

I'm a non-USian, so I'm genuinely curious what the actions you feel should have been taken instead.

He should have been cuffed and arrested as he stepped out of the Whitehouse when his first term ended. Instead Biden called him a legitimate threat to democracy while doing absolutely jack shit to protect his citizens from said threat. And guess what? HE TURNED OUT TO BE A LEGITIMATE THREAT TO OUR MOTHERFUCKING DEMOCRACY. WHO COULD HAVE GUESSED.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

How else should prosecution have been done?

Merrick Garland's DOJ had four full years to build a case and prosecute it. Instead, he let Alvin Bragg do all the heavy lifting from the NYC DA's office, in a case that couldn't even wrap up before the election was over.

I’m genuinely curious what the actions you feel should have been taken instead.

There are people in Guantanamo Bay who have been imprisoned for over twenty years without a trial. People who have been cooling their heels through five different Presidential Administrations. If Joe Biden had seriously wanted to flex the muscles of the police state, if he truly believed Donald Trump was an existential threat operating on behalf of a foreign power on par with Muhammad Rahim or Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman al-Bahlul, he'd have been tried in a military court for treasonous acts in cooperation with a hostile military power.

I got over eight fucking years of people saying he was in league with everyone from the FSB to the Italian Mafia and they all had a Steele Dossier full of evidence to prove it. That's before you even get on the Epstein stuff (and Epstein's ties to Mossad, which we all know Biden wasn't going to touch).

The least you could do was nail him the way we did Martha fucking Stewart and lock him up on insider trading while in office.

The sky was the fucking limit with this guy. He stunk to high heaven with the sheer volume of crimes. High Treason, Espionage Act, any number of white collar crimes, take your fucking pick. The FEC took Sam Bankman-Fried from free man to locked up inside nine months. Don't tell me that same agency couldn't have had Trump as quickly.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

By the criminal justice system. For his actual crimes. Congress need not be involved. Alternatively, Biden could have "Whatever the president does is legal as long as it's an official act"ed him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 65 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 hours ago

Peepee tape when?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 72 points 12 hours ago

it’s like watching a 5 yr slapping everyone and then gets a slap back and goes ‘ouch that hurts!!’

ANYWAYS: EPSTEIN FILES. WHERE THEY AT?

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Im not a huge fan of Newsome but you got to give it to him. It took too long but someone is finally hitting Trump where it hurts. That is all anyone wanted to begin with. Had Kamala done this she would have won the election.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 171 points 15 hours ago (13 children)

Mocking Fascists; Making them look foolish and ridiculing them, works. It's even more effective than just holding their feet to flame like Kamala.

This is probably why Jon Stewart is looking at running. Someone like him or Jordan Klepper is the worst case scenario.

[–] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 119 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

The best strategy the democrats had was calling republicans weird, but then it just got cut off as it was gaining traction.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 53 points 14 hours ago

It’s been telling seeing how quickly many news sources abandoned any semblance of honesty when their owners tightened up on the reins.

In the last two years I completely changed which sources I get news from, now I’m paying for more smaller sources and completely avoiding aggregators like Google or Apple news.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 31 points 15 hours ago

It was too successful, and their oligarch handlers wanted fascism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 15 hours ago (26 children)

This is probably why Jon Stewart is looking at running.

Is he? I thought it was just other people saying he should

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mormund@feddit.org 100 points 14 hours ago (17 children)

The Newsom hype is a bit weird tbh. Like anything is better than Trump. But please America do better than business as usual...

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

I don't idolize Newsom, but he's doing something. No one else is. Credit where credit is due.

No matter what, he's orders of magnitude better than Trump. He's also white, male, and straight and America has a big problem voting for anyone that doesn't meet that criteria.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 108 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

It's because he's the only one actually doing anything. It sucks that he's the one who is doing it, but we should be encouraging the behavior instead of shitting on the only person giving Trump the middle finger.

Is he perfect? Hell no. But don't let perfect stand in the way of good. Well, maybe not good, but not a genocidal fascist.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 38 points 12 hours ago

This. He's not a progressive dem, and he won't win me over against mostother candidates. However, how he is getting under Trump's skin should be a blueprint for every other D out there if they want a fighting chance in the midterms and forward.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

My one hope there is that Dems will pick up on the fact that the only people getting noticed in their party are the people who are at least fucking trying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

It's also likely because all of the billionaires running media companies want him as the next Dem choice, so his headlines stick around.

Plenty of Progressives make noise, too, but they're never given any screen time.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

I bet a lot of people would love to get back to business as usual as a pit stop on the way towards progress.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 15 points 10 hours ago

Its hilarious that rump did not realize how long people have been laughing at him for this.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Hallmark of the troglodyte republican. All caps rants and conspiracies, then when questioned and present contradictory fact, FOLLOWS WITH THREATS AND INSULTS FOLLOWED BY A SIMLEY FACE 😁.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Trump is dismantling the country and here we are nitpicking about him using CAPS LOCK. My fellow Americans, you will have much to answer for when this is over.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 23 points 12 hours ago

you will have much to answer for when this is over.

Sure, come on over and start pulling people out of the shanties in our warring factions of techno-feudalism and asking them all kinds of questions about why their grandparents chose to vote based on caps-lock use and memes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 30 points 14 hours ago

I'm not even surprised that "cyber bulling the president" is in this timeline. Cards Against Humanity needs to be taking notes.

load more comments
view more: next ›