this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
520 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

9922 readers
1335 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 168 points 5 hours ago (7 children)

I mean, if all the wealthy did this instead of their endless grind to own more and more at the expense of everyone else, the world would be a lot better.

The ultra wealthy have a hoarding mental illness. Most people would have stopped working long before they got to the point they did.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

Yeah, exactly. This lifestyle described requires a fair amount of wealth, and yet there are many people who have that kind of wealth and choose not to live that lifestyle.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 32 minutes ago

Not sure what’s worse, then you have their nepo baby kids who never worked but now have all that money and can buy whatever companies they want and make whatever shitty business decisions they want.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 32 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

They could also shut the fuck up for like five minutes but nope. We get the Met Gala instead. Rich people parading around on TV for poor people to watch. It’s insane how mentally deranged all of it is.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 minutes ago

But what if there was more than being really, really, really good looking.

ORANGE MOCHA FRAPPUCINO!!!

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

To be fair, there are rich people that don't make much noise but for obvious reasons you don't tend to hear much about those ones...

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

In San Francisco, it's generally considered gauche to flaunt wealth. It was funny to be treated as if I could actually afford some of the things in stores, but it beats the LA Pretty Woman attitude!

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 69 points 4 hours ago (6 children)

I've had this same thought. Like, if I ever had the opportunity to be as rich as Bezos or Musk, I don't think I'd make it because I would've stopped so much earlier.

At a certain point, I'd just think "Sweet, we're set for life, and I can spend all my time with my wife and kids." Why would I sacrifice that kind of life just to see numbers on my bank accounts go up in a way that no longer meaningfully affects us?

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Because you have a mental disorder forcing you to do anything to feel important and validated as the genius you hope other people will see you as

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

Me too. Honestly, I’ve gotten to the point where I believe one is actually required to be sociopathic and all that comes with it in order to become that ultra wealthy. Capitalism essentially rewards these traits and concentrates them into the greed for power at the cost of all else that we see as a through line with these people.

People like us and most everyone else just aren’t wired that way, as ultimately we each have a limit to what and who we are willing to sacrifice for material means. We all have experienced greed to some degree within ourselves, but the difference is that it has a ‘bottom’ so to speak.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 9 points 3 hours ago

Im poor asf and still retired. I'm living this life without the money part. I have zero need to fuck up other peoples lives just because i dont work.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 22 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Plenty of people probably did, but the ones that don't are the ones that stand out, so they're the ones we know. Nobody cares about the guy who made a billion dollars and fucked off somewhere; even if they're still a blight on the country with that much wealth, we've got bigger fish to fry.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Tom is the exact model of how I want to see people get rich. He got his bag and then disappeared off the face of the planet. He's not in politics trying to enact a cyberpunk state. He's not in the news every day telling you that if you give your kids a measles shot you're performing the work of the devil. He's off on a beach somewhere taking photos because he loves it, not bothering a soul. Tom is an alright dude and I have no problems with him.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Hopefully they don't fund some evil shit

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

I'd just think "Sweet, we're set for life, and I can spend all my time with my wife and kids." Why would I sacrifice that kind of life just to see numbers on my bank accounts go up in a way that no longer meaningfully affects us?

I'm sure there are a massive amount of rich people with this mindset. we just don't hear about it cause the few that keep on getting wealthy for the sake of power ruin it for everybody

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 7 points 3 hours ago

There's a lot a billionaires and far more millionaires out there we don't ever hear about. I think you're probably right.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Basically the entire FIRE movement

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 25 points 4 hours ago

But think of how many people's lives you could ruin with that kind of power!

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 9 points 4 hours ago

Rich people don't relentlessly grind. They have people for that.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If I was a man with influence, I'd petition to get "billionair" in the dsm.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I think they spell things correctly in the DSM

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago

I'm sorry, did you not understand me? It's one those things you sit in while your hairdresser cuts your hair.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Those don't look like spelling errors

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago

The blog post is non-exhaustive and from over a decade ago. You're welcome to look at the errata and confirm they always spell everything correctly every time: https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm/updates-to-dsm/updates-to-dsm-5-tr-criteria-text

[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We could have this if the systems in place didn't provide perverse incentives for sociopaths.

We only need the will to correct the systems, but the sociopaths now have the power of highly distributed propaganda.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 3 points 2 hours ago

Yes see, we ARE correcting the system, by forcing the 5 Pro trans athletes to not be athletes and bombing Iranian kids and locking up anyone Mexican and Mexican adjacent!

/s

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

The ultra wealthy keep on that grind as they perpetually sustain generation after generation of failsons.

The difference between old money and new money is just how many generations back you go to the first/last grinder in the lineage.