Lemmy Shitpost
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
view the rest of the comments
Sure. It's also not weird for someone to not want to be with someone who's keeping you around as a backup or piece of ass, especially being represented as a real relationship. Putting your all into one person and expecting the same back isn't that radical of a concept.
Does that apply both ways? Cause everything I've read about modern dating culture is that women can talk to as many men at a time as they want to as long as they're not exclusives, and if a man doesn't like that then he's an insecure chauvinist loser. At least that's what I've been told.
But it's still not okay for men to talk to multiple women at a time? I'm tired of these double standards.
My understanding is that, in the pre-exclusive phase, either party can be talking to multiple people (hence the "unexeclusive" part), it's just generally in bad taste to bring it up or talk about, and it's much more likely for a woman to have multiple people interested in her than a man. So the likelihood of a man exclusively dating a woman who is not exclusively dating him is decent, and that can feel one sided.
Well the context from the post makes it seem pre-exclusive because "talking to" is the name of a phase before exclusivity.
Because "dating" is confusingly starting to take on the same meaning as "in a relationship with," which makes no sense but vernacular language doesn't care about contradictions