this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
178 points (95.9% liked)

Canada

11973 readers
671 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

so...you admit there are jobs, but worry it will be bad in 4 years?

either you are being intentionally negative, or unintentionally negative about the trades - regardless, this conversation is done

cheers

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm not sure he knows much about the trades. Trades are lead by licensed/ ticketed workers. Repairs and solutions must follow codes. Lot more to it than most people think. Robots can do tasks like welding or repetitive tasks but they can't trouble shoot nor do they make sense for one time projects.

AI robots would require a lot of detailed accurate information and aren't able to look at abstract physical objects like Date from Star Trek.

I work maintenance in a factory.

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 2 points 3 days ago

I will admit I do not work in trades so I won't pretend to, but I am aware of licensure and unions. To this you are correct they are a great strength and benefit to these fields and jobs that have really helped these individuals retain their jobs and skills. With robotics and AI specifically no they cannot replace these individuals currently; however, there has been a push to deregulate which would not overnight ruin these careers but it will encroach. We can see an example of this in Texas where they removed the requirement of bar exam for legal jobs, and we have seen more of a push to use non traditional means in this position. So while I agree these jobs have some current protection it may be only temporary if these are the same people who are willing to trash other career fields over automation. We do have a bit of a gray area though around the remote form of robotics that are controlled by a human possibly even one with licensure.

I have however work in robotics. Most robots are exactly as you say in a factory and not really that capable, but this is very rapidly changing as we create robots more and more capable of general tasks and dexterity. The robots that I have seen designed specifically for HVAC jobs are not particularly great yet compared to their human counterparts are very skilled at the few things they can currently do and I'm not talking about like ones in a factory I'm talking about ones deployed on a home call to work on someone's air-conditioning system. These are the ones that I am concerned about, and for those that aren't you will be. It very well could be long in the future but companies are taking steps to do this as soon as they can and it spreads so far beyond just trade jobs.

The current state of AI as LLMs is pretty low risk as far as I am concerned for any skilled worker. Won't change any time soon either, but we know why they are doing this. Our corporations have exposed their true end motives. They full and well would rid themselves of every employee if they could. None of us know what the future is going to look like, but thinking it's not going to spread beyond software or unskilled work is not going to end well. What starts as the incapable robot in a factory iteration after iteration is suddenly capable. We now have the tech to make these a reality where even half a decade before we did not. The only hurdle is the legal side of things to which we see movement to dismantle even if only a little at a time. Most people seem concerned about full on automation/AI but that's not the near term threat. It's remote physical labor. Again look at the medical field and 7/11 using robots to restock their shelves. Neither of those are AI, but are taking jobs from the US annually. One at a time step by step headcounts are reduced. This won't be a sudden torrent, but a trickle.

[–] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

apprentices start working immediately, led by licensed/ticketed journeymen

your language and approach to this make me think you are not having this conversation in good faith, and are in fact attempting to sow confusion and uncertainty about how easy it is to join a trade and how significant the demand is

fin

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fully agree here. They were not in good faith, and made a lot of assumptions with little articulation. Their argument works well for a single individual in a vacuum but you apply that to everyone with job loss and it falls apart. Thank you for your statement.

[–] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

the trades are free to join and you get paid immediately

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 2 points 3 days ago

You can keep saying this misleading statement to me all you want, but it does not change reality.

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I agree that there are jobs and have been jobs for trade and non trade jobs yes. In terms of numbers Ai has not taken jobs from anyone, but rather has been used as reason for layoffs as it sounds better than financial woes in these organizations. This is also supported by research/data. The current number of jobs is also consistent with what they were pre COVID inflation.

Again yes I am concerned about what is coming because I am a forward thinking person. I make plans because hopping fields is expensive to do. I am not sure why this is such a surprise for you? I am not sure how I was being negative about the trades at all. I'm just saying it's not a silver bullet to the upcoming career crisis if we are to believe AI is actually a threat. What may be a concern for some fields now it's only going to either broaden directly because of that same threat or because of oversaturation as those who were once in their own careers no longer can and look for work elsewhere that had not yet had the rug pulled out from under them. You can chose to ignore that I am saying and that's fine, but sticking your head in the sand doesn't stop this from approaching.

[–] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

the trades are free and you get paid immediately

god luck

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Licensure is not free at least here in the US nor are the materials to acquire it. The cost is not just getting into the job though, you have to consider the cost of leaving a job that could have been better paying that maybe no longer exists. Someone with a family that just is not a real option. Now apply this "just go into a trade" logic to everyone who has lost their jobs or wants to have something better than they currently do and you'll run out of trade jobs very fast. Same problem as today but different lens. Then what?